Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
lensfun 0.2.5 is now in experimental: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576230 so ufraw 0.17 could be packaged there, too... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
Hello, beginning with UFRaw 0.17 which was release on April 1st, lensfun is no longer experimental. The release notes state (quote): Lens distortion corrections using lensfun. This feature is now fully implemented and enabled by default. Please package UFRaw version 0.17 before Squeeze goes into freeze, and enable lensfun. Thank you. Regards, Adolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:07:23 +0200 Adolf Winterer adolf.j.winte...@inn-salzach.de wrote: beginning with UFRaw 0.17 which was release on April 1st, lensfun is no longer experimental. The release notes state (quote): Lens distortion corrections using lensfun. This feature is now fully implemented and enabled by default. Please package UFRaw version 0.17 before Squeeze goes into freeze, and enable lensfun. Thank you. Unfortunately, ufraw wants lensfun 0.2.5 (released on April 1), while Debian only has lensfun 0.2.4. (Cc-ing Mark Purcell and the Debian KDE Extras Team, who maintain lensfun) -- Hubert Chathi uho...@debian.org -- Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
Package: ufraw Version: 0.16-1 Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** Including lensfun would allow to correct the image BEFORE it is transferred into the mostly 8 bit per channel workflow. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ufraw depends on: ii desktop-file-utils 0.15-2Utilities for .desktop files ii libatk1.0-01.28.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-3 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.9-25GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libexiv2-5 0.18.2-1+b1 EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation li ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.4.1-4 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.2-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgomp1 4.4.1-4 GCC OpenMP (GOMP) support library ii libgtk2.0-02.18.3-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkimageview0 1.6.1-2 image viewer widget for GTK+ ii libjpeg62 6b-15 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms1 1.18.dfsg-1 Color management library ii libpango1.0-0 1.26.0-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.40-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.4.1-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.9.1-1 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime ufraw recommends no packages. ufraw suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:12:39 +0100 Adolf Winterer adolf.j.winte...@inn-salzach.de wrote: Including lensfun would allow to correct the image BEFORE it is transferred into the mostly 8 bit per channel workflow. Lensfun support is still considered experimental. I will compile ufraw with lensfun when it is no longer considered experimental. -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
Am Sonntag 15 November 2009 11:46:50 schrieb Hubert Chathi: On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:12:39 +0100 Adolf Winterer adolf.j.winte...@inn-salzach.de wrote: Including lensfun would allow to correct the image BEFORE it is transferred into the mostly 8 bit per channel workflow. Lensfun support is still considered experimental. I will compile ufraw with lensfun when it is no longer considered experimental. Hello Hubert, Thank you for your quick response. Although I can understand the reasoning behind your decision I'm still a little bit disappointed. Regards, Adolf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:54:22 +0100 Adolf Winterer adolf.j.winte...@inn-salzach.de wrote: Thank you for your quick response. Although I can understand the reasoning behind your decision I'm still a little bit disappointed. I can understand the disappointment. I haven't tried it out myself, but it sounds like a very useful feature. It's not just my decision, though -- Udi recommends against compiling with lensfun in distributed packages on his page that describes the feature, and its caveats. -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: hub...@uhoreg.ca - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#556277: ufraw: Please compile with lensfun support
Am Sonntag 15 November 2009 22:55:25 schrieb Hubert Chathi: On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:54:22 +0100 Adolf Winterer adolf.j.winte...@inn-salzach.de wrote: Thank you for your quick response. Although I can understand the reasoning behind your decision I'm still a little bit disappointed. I can understand the disappointment. I haven't tried it out myself, but it sounds like a very useful feature. It's not just my decision, though -- Udi recommends against compiling with lensfun in distributed packages on his page that describes the feature, and its caveats. I've also visited his page and read the caveats. I'm not sure if the caveats are still valid for version 0.16, as only versions 0.14 and 0.15 are explicitely mentioned. Maybe he just forgot to update this particular page after the release of version 0.16. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
