Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
On 24.11.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Mo, 23 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package / luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Hmmm ... 0:0.40.6-1+b1 = 0.40.6 is true, so replaces should definitely be enough ... why on earth. I guess we need a conflict here, instead of a replace. No, replace should be enough. Bummer. Anyone having an idea? Maybe I'm doing something wrong. I try to install using: apt-get -t experimental install luatex tex-common texlive-binaries texlive-common texlive-base apt-cache show luatex tells me, that 0.44.0-2 is available, hence I'd expect that first luatex is upgraded and then texlive-base. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
On 24.11.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Di, 24 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, apt-get -t experimental install luatex tex-common texlive-binaries texlive-common texlive-base apt-cache show luatex tells me, that 0.44.0-2 is available, hence I'd expect that first luatex is upgraded and then texlive-base. The problem is that i386 luatex hasn't been built by now. No idea why. Experimental has luatex for all BUT i386 built Correct, but there is already 0.44.0-2 for i386. This version does not contain any more dviluatex. Hence upgrading luatex before installing texlive-base should solve the problem. I just don't understand, why apt-get doesn't do this. No, I don't think this is a problem in apt-get. H. -- I must have a prodigious quantity of mind; it takes me as much as a week sometimes to make it up. -- Mark Twain, The Innocents Abroad http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
found 557117 2009-2 stop On 21.11.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Sa, 21 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, Reported already, fixed already by adding replace = 0.40.6 and depends = 0.44.0 Not sure, if we need a versioned depend and replace at the same time. If the TL package depends on luatex x.y a luatex package of version x.y-1 will kicked out by itself. I am not 100% sure. It might happen that the one is unpacked before the other is unpacked, which will create a failure. initial state: - luatex old, texlive-base old installed - both are upgraded, apt-get is happy because of depends satisfied - both are unpacked, but first the texlive-base and tries to overwrite the old files that are still there ?? With the new texlive-base the problem still occurs: (Reading database ... 93754 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace texlive-base 2007.dfsg.2-4 (using .../texlive-base_2009-2_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement texlive-base ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package / luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Processing triggers for menu ... Processing triggers for install-info ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-2_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I guess we need a conflict here, instead of a replace. H. -- Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement. http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
On Mo, 23 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package / luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Hmmm ... 0:0.40.6-1+b1 = 0.40.6 is true, so replaces should definitely be enough ... why on earth. I guess we need a conflict here, instead of a replace. No, replace should be enough. Bummer. Anyone having an idea? Thanks Hilmar for testing!!! Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert PreiningAssociate Professor JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology prein...@jaist.ac.jp Vienna University of Technology prein...@logic.at Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force)prein...@debian.org gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- AINDERBY STEEPLE (n.) One who asks you a question with the apparent motive of wanting to hear your answer, but who cuts short your opening sentence by leaning forward and saying 'and I'll tell you why I ask...' and then talking solidly for the next hour. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
On 19.11.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Do, 19 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Reported already, fixed already by adding replace = 0.40.6 and depends = 0.44.0 Not sure, if we need a versioned depend and replace at the same time. If the TL package depends on luatex x.y a luatex package of version x.y-1 will kicked out by itself. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
On 19.11.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: On Do, 19 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Reported already, fixed already by adding replace = 0.40.6 and depends = 0.44.0 I didn't get this bug Have a nice weekend, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
Package: texlive-base Version: 2009-1 Severity: important Hi, I tried to upgrade to experimental and have luatex installed: sid:~# apt-get -t experimental install luatex tex-common texlive-binaries texlive-common texlive-base Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: dvipdfmx Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. Suggested packages: perl-tk Recommended packages: texlive-luatex The following NEW packages will be installed: texlive-binaries The following packages will be upgraded: luatex tex-common texlive-base texlive-common 4 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 33 not upgraded. 22 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/24.9MB of archives. After this operation, 29.2MB of additional disk space will be used. Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done Reading changelogs... Done Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 93754 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace texlive-base 2007.dfsg.2-4 (using .../texlive-base_2009-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement texlive-base ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Processing triggers for install-info ... Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2009-1_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I guess the texlive-base should conflict with the old luatex still containing dviluatex. H. -- Package-specific info: If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries (latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the error in your report. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures! If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem), you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that can be found at http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini-en.html (english) or http://www.latex-einfuehrung.de/mini.html (german) ## minimal input file ## other files ## List of ls-R files lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 May 5 2009 /usr/share/texmf-texlive/ls-R - /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE ## Config files Warning: texmf.cnf cannot be found with kpsewhich! Warning: fmtutil.cnf cannot be found with kpsewhich! Warning: updmap.cfg cannot be found with kpsewhich! Warning: language.dat cannot be found with kpsewhich! ## Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/ total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Nov 10 2008 mktex.cnf ## md5sums of texmf.d 31cc6be615a9a692d5593984543e7e5b /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf 5f7f6652cc8b8071c9e4ea6ba9e9f0a1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/15Plain.cnf f68e5add6afd6585b982f2f78e2e6a92 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf ea33127256c6a9f37145ae5b16fdb80c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf afccf1d3f87057411166a77c58e00bd1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/65BibTeX.cnf 9da7c1c7b1eaf06f941af91f48a23068 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf 7ae52efac46feb97010986e57877d12e /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80DVIPDFMx.cnf 37329819f1109e8a457e64b8b58fecdb /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf a8952d594677235951d447665ec46e9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90TeXDoc.cnf 30f4f13357c2761ed01a6a15f28725a5 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf 1df66bc319cec731e202eaf39f5d85e1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages texlive-base depends on: ii dpkg 1.15.5.2 Debian package management system ii tex-common 1.20 common infrastructure for building pn texlive-base-bin none(no description available) ii texlive-common 2007.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Base component pn texlive-doc-base none(no description available) Versions of packages texlive-base recommends: ii dvipdfmx1:20090708-1 A DVI to PDF translator with CJK s ii lmodern 2.004.1-1scalable PostScript and OpenType f texlive-base suggests no packages. Versions of packages
Bug#557117: texlive-base need conflict with old luatex
severity 557117 normal merge 557086 557117 thanks On Do, 19 Nov 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/dviluatex', which is also in package luatex 0:0.40.6-1+b1 Reported already, fixed already by adding replace = 0.40.6 and depends = 0.44.0 Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert PreiningAssociate Professor JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology prein...@jaist.ac.jp Vienna University of Technology prein...@logic.at Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force)prein...@debian.org gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- `How do you feel?' he asked him. bits of me keep passing out.' `We're safe,' he said. `Oh good,' said Arthur. in one of the spaceships of the Vogon Constructor Fleet.' this is obviously some strange usage of the word safe that I wasn't previously aware of.' --- Arthur after his first ever teleport ride. --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
