Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-02 Thread Hakan Ardo
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Elrond
elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:
 Hi Hakan,

 Thanks for your quick investigations!

 * Can I tag the bug confirmed?

Yes, I can reproduce it.

 * Do you need any further input from me to continue with
  this issue?

Probably not, but if so I'll let you know :)

-- 
Håkan Ardö



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-02 Thread Elrond
package binutils-avr
tags 558335 + confirmed
thanks


On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 09:38:25AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
[...]
  * Do you need any further input from me to continue with
   this issue?
 
 Probably not, but if so I'll let you know :)

Good.

Thanks for your work!

Elrond



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-12-01 Thread Elrond
Hi Hakan,

Thanks for your quick investigations!

* Can I tag the bug confirmed?
* Do you need any further input from me to continue with
  this issue?


Greetings

Elrond


On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
 Hi,
 it seams to be the patch adding support for xmega devices that
 intoruces this bug.
[...]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-29 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi,
thanx for the report. I'll look into it...

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond
elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:

 Package: binutils-avr
 Version: 2.20-2

 Here's the problem in very short:

  avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o
   try_asm:
    0:   25 91           lpm     r18, Z+
    2:   24 91           lpm     r18, Z+
    4:   08 95           ret

 The longer description can be found at [1].

 Which brings us to the strange part of this issue:

 I reported this upstream [1] but upstream claims, that it
 is fixed in 2.20. And they suggest, that this is a problem
 in the debian packaging.
 I hope you can clear this thing up much faster than I can.


    Elrond


 [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10964






-- 
Håkan Ardö



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-29 Thread Hakan Ardo
Hi,
it seams to be the patch adding support for xmega devices that
intoruces this bug.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Hakan Ardo ha...@ardoe.net wrote:
 Hi,
 thanx for the report. I'll look into it...

 On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond
 elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:

 Package: binutils-avr
 Version: 2.20-2

 Here's the problem in very short:

  avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o
   try_asm:
    0:   25 91           lpm     r18, Z+
    2:   24 91           lpm     r18, Z+
    4:   08 95           ret

 The longer description can be found at [1].

 Which brings us to the strange part of this issue:

 I reported this upstream [1] but upstream claims, that it
 is fixed in 2.20. And they suggest, that this is a problem
 in the debian packaging.
 I hope you can clear this thing up much faster than I can.


    Elrond


 [1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10964






 --
 Håkan Ardö




-- 
Håkan Ardö



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#558335: avr-objdump disassembles lpm rX, Z wrongly

2009-11-27 Thread Elrond

Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.20-2

Here's the problem in very short:

  avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o
   try_asm:
0:   25 91   lpm r18, Z+
2:   24 91   lpm r18, Z+
4:   08 95   ret

The longer description can be found at [1].

Which brings us to the strange part of this issue:

I reported this upstream [1] but upstream claims, that it
is fixed in 2.20. And they suggest, that this is a problem
in the debian packaging.
I hope you can clear this thing up much faster than I can.


Elrond


[1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10964



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org