Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc
Package: maildrop Version: 2.2.0-3 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The tolower() and toupper() function calls in the mailfilter always return empty results. Recompiling recipenode.C with -O1 option for gcc instead of -O2 returns these function to normal behavior. This functionality is important as these calls are necessary to be able to properly use gdbm functionality. NOTE: This bug is a duplicate of #536253, but applies equally to maildrop. - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages maildrop depends on: ii courier-authlib 0.62.4-1 Courier authentication library ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.4.2-3 GCC support library ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-9GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii libpcre3 7.8-3 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libstdc++64.4.2-3The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages maildrop recommends: ii postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.6.5-3High-performance mail transport ag maildrop suggests no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLFR8UAAoJEKB7YbRsd8TG+gsP/15LVlU/FaKy00DQhg+oT2ex g6hVlu/yfJ273GuQZWJ2eP2SgfASc/NAlhREu2P0sc+ePOmb88Voh0Ye8eWKXVs4 +3+MXUCR+1vTyLt07RQ1wT4Zupy4XhoWMBtzOmMxzg9kpvoM6smCQ37I9zjVtdgr 3HU+1u4Exh738w1e4BJ7cQ8CjPk9pBvga2rzRYjiRAS6R3vugNYo7FQQZbEc1nE4 OBkG0lhf6B157ggHLwES7eDQy27YKUulCC7m8CuxOSG7w4H7pYiVXfO2sMFEaC1+ ZGpMeFFzhd9iwevW8Jljz5TBD4Lzh5GURSI8ho6AuMXE2z8nzupqmvTpdkx+3Zd2 jY8gkL3F7KGAM6zfiYXxrH3KqdoUjOFjaKdnEekJ7W9ldKIIOBG7xFv6XYc537Tn yixJGey8WuK6cD78lu1KWuEhIray8t/XRi/u5lh9Vp6tTW9pmkKfWvTeyZVXpxvR 5TwS3eXg6O37UmvFaVWfM7/s7U8osIVLvcXR8BTLVkCEDymz43c2VMNcqYhno/Et 1+3ftuj/74X9LEejtYFW9uNUjnWAkfkLMPD0H/YFLLzZlFb9/i57R5JdQXQQWHOi 5ypD1KaO3XPmk+7lH27b+M8kKsAbxxZLB9UyhyhAE8gGLOsKUkoMC7iYZtetZWC3 6Mg9TDC0whalYYnq0LEB =jlJ+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:50:21PM +, Paul Saunders wrote: Package: maildrop Version: 2.2.0-3 Severity: important The tolower() and toupper() function calls in the mailfilter always return empty results. Recompiling recipenode.C with -O1 option for gcc instead of -O2 returns these function to normal behavior. This functionality is important as these calls are necessary to be able to properly use gdbm functionality. Let's try checking with the gcc maintainers to find out why they would be doing this to us :) I'm Cc:ing the debian-gcc mailing list. Is there a bug in maildrop-2.2.0/maildrop/recipenode.C that causes it to get compiled differently with -O1, or is the problem with the compiler? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: Is there a bug in maildrop-2.2.0/maildrop/recipenode.C that causes it to get compiled differently with -O1, or is the problem with the compiler? Are you able to produce a minimal testcase? Bastian -- Our way is peace. -- Septimus, the Son Worshiper, Bread and Circuses, stardate 4040.7. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559045: maildrop filter tolower() and toupper() functionality get optimized out by gcc
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:38:34 +0100, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:26:29PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: Is there a bug in maildrop-2.2.0/maildrop/recipenode.C that causes it to get compiled differently with -O1, or is the problem with the compiler? Are you able to produce a minimal testcase? Certainly. If we have a filter test.mailfilter as follows: FOO=TestTestTest LOWERFOO = tolower($FOO) UPPERFOO = toupper($FOO) echo FOO is $FOO echo LOWERFOO should be testtesttest, is $LOWERFOO echo UPPERFOO should be TESTTESTTEST, is $UPPERFOO With the standard build, I do echo | maildrop test.mailfilter and get FOO is TestTestTest LOWERFOO should be testtesttest, is UPPERFOO should be TESTTESTTEST, is But with the -O1 build, I get FOO is TestTestTest LOWERFOO should be testtesttest, is testtesttest UPPERFOO should be TESTTESTTEST, is TESTTESTTEST Bastian -- Our way is peace. -- Septimus, the Son Worshiper, Bread and Circuses, stardate 4040.7. -- Darac Marjal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
