Bug#560252: Bug#559136: Bug#560252: band-aid fix

2010-01-11 Thread Keith Packard 
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:26 +0100, Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org wrote:

 Could you please bump the dependency on defoma to = 0.11.10-4 with
 the next upload, as we still have badly built packages in the
 archive?

I'll set a build dependency on 0.11.10-4 but leave the suggests at 0.7.0
as this is strictly a packaging issue and not a run-time issue. Make
sense to you?

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


pgpFdZ46E7gzm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#559136: Bug#560252: Bug#559136: Bug#560252: band-aid fix

2010-01-11 Thread Andreas Barth 
* Keith Packard (kei...@keithp.com) [100111 20:32]:
 On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:38:26 +0100, Andreas Barth a...@not.so.argh.org 
 wrote:
 
  Could you please bump the dependency on defoma to = 0.11.10-4 with
  the next upload, as we still have badly built packages in the
  archive?
 
 I'll set a build dependency on 0.11.10-4 but leave the suggests at 0.7.0
 as this is strictly a packaging issue and not a run-time issue. Make
 sense to you?

Absolutly. Thanks.


Cheers,
Andi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#560252: Bug#559136: Bug#560252: band-aid fix

2010-01-10 Thread Andreas Barth 
Hi,

* Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) [091231 17:49]:
 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (31/12/2009):
  Right, I didn't realize there was a bug in defoma as well which was
  causing this problem; having found an obvious bug in my packaging, I
  thought that would have fixed the bug; sorry for not testing it
  properly.
 
 Oh well, since in the end, final fixes are flowing in quite quickly,
 we shouldn't be have many more troubles with those defoma thingies. :)

Could you please bump the dependency on defoma to = 0.11.10-4 with
the next upload, as we still have badly built packages in the
archive? (They probably don't hurt as long as all chroots have defoma
installed, but well - or just conflict with 0.11.10-3. Nothing too
urgent, but should just really be fixed.)


Cheers,
Andi



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#560252: Bug#559136: Bug#560252: band-aid fix

2009-12-31 Thread Keith Packard 
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:10:49 +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:

 Still, losing Riku's band-aid wasn't nice. Anyway, now that the root
 issue's being addressed, the band-aid shouldn't be necessary for too
 much time.

Right, I didn't realize there was a bug in defoma as well which was
causing this problem; having found an obvious bug in my packaging, I
thought that would have fixed the bug; sorry for not testing it
properly.

I'll follow your suggested testing method before uploading a new version
(with a suitable ACK for the current NMU).

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com


pgp1OS1io0VFc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#560252: Bug#559136: Bug#560252: band-aid fix

2009-12-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (31/12/2009):
 Right, I didn't realize there was a bug in defoma as well which was
 causing this problem; having found an obvious bug in my packaging, I
 thought that would have fixed the bug; sorry for not testing it
 properly.

Oh well, since in the end, final fixes are flowing in quite quickly,
we shouldn't be have many more troubles with those defoma thingies. :)

 I'll follow your suggested testing method before uploading a new
 version (with a suitable ACK for the current NMU).

Just to be clear, I don't really mind dropping some changelog entries,
it's not about being famous or whatever. It was just too bad to see
those chroot breakages happen again. ;)

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature