Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-05 Thread Pavel Reznicek


Hi Martin,

  sorry I haven't checked the other bug reports before writting this one - 
looking at bugs #501280 and #253524, it seems like the frequency monitor 
may not work on some processors. As written in my previous report, I did 
not have a chance to compare the monitor on two identical processors, so 
it may be that the problem of main is related just to the Intel Core2 Duo 
processor and is not a consequence of the used architecture.


Best regards,
Pavel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-05 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Pavel!

* Pavel Reznicek rezni...@ipnp.troja.mff.cuni.cz [2010-01-05 11:00]:

   sorry I haven't checked the other bug reports before writting this one - 
 looking at bugs #501280 and #253524, it seems like the frequency monitor 
 may not work on some processors. As written in my previous report, I did 
 not have a chance to compare the monitor on two identical processors, so 
 it may be that the problem of main is related just to the Intel Core2 Duo 
 processor and is not a consequence of the used architecture.

Can you try if x86info produces proper results? If yes a sync with the
code there (acutally gkrellm-x86info is just a gkrellm plugin that
borrows code from x86info) should fix the problem.

Yours Martin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-05 Thread Pavel Reznicek


Hi Martin,

  no, x86info is also reporting wrong estimate. However, examining more 
the output of cpufreq-info, it may be that the estimate by x86info is 
actually right:


I have 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo. When I set the frequency to 800 MHz by 
cpufreq-set -f 80, then the cpufreq-info reports following 
information:


current CPU frequency is 800 MHz.
cpufreq stats: 2.40 GHz:88.56%, 2.00 GHz:0.00%, ... , 800 MHz:11.44%

See the strange fractions of 2.4GHz and 800MHz. It looks like the CPU 
frequency scalling on some processors (here the Core 2 Duo) is not as 
simple as just having a lower/higher constant frequency.


Since (gkrellm-)x86info is estimating the real frequency, I would say that 
the behaviour is a feature of the package and not a bug (and most probably 
the same applies to the bugs #501280 and #253524).


And obviously it has nothing to do with the architecture.

Best regards,
Pavel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-04 Thread Pavel Reznicek


Hello,

  are you really sure the package works fine on amd64 ? When enabling it 
in gkrellm, I can see a fluctuating frequency, but when I switch my Intel 
Core2 Duo to 800 MHz (using cpufreq-set), there is no change in the 
frequency monitoriged by gkrellm, although cpufreq-get command returns 
800MHz.


While on a desktop with AMD QuadCore and a laptop with PentiumM - but both 
with i386 architecture, the gkrellm monitor scales correctly when changing 
the frequency via cpufreq-set.


Cheers,
Pavel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-04 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Pavel!

* Pavel Reznicek rezni...@ipnp.troja.mff.cuni.cz [2010-01-04 18:42]:

   are you really sure the package works fine on amd64 ? When enabling it 
 in gkrellm, I can see a fluctuating frequency, but when I switch my Intel 
 Core2 Duo to 800 MHz (using cpufreq-set), there is no change in the 
 frequency monitoriged by gkrellm, although cpufreq-get command returns 
 800MHz.
 
 While on a desktop with AMD QuadCore and a laptop with PentiumM - but both 
 with i386 architecture, the gkrellm monitor scales correctly when changing 
 the frequency via cpufreq-set.

Hmm it looks correct on my Notebook. Since upstream appears no longer
interested in the package I assume I need to track the delta to current
x86info myself.

This will take some time so please be patient.

Yours Martin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#562699: fixed in gkrellm-x86info 0.0.2-8 - fix confirmed

2010-01-03 Thread Carl Johnson
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

 This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
 which was filed against the gkrellm-x86info package:

 #562699: Add gkrellm-x86info to amd64 port

 It has been closed by Martin Wuertele m...@debian.org.

 Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
 If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
 better one in a separate message then please contact Martin Wuertele 
 m...@debian.org by
 replying to this email.

I just installed the package on my lenny system and it works fine.  I
also downloaded the source and it builds a working package.

Thanks for the quick response!

-- 
Carl Johnsonca...@peak.org





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org