Bug#565492: buildd.debian.org: add Packages-arch-specific-version for dapl

2010-01-17 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Saturday 16 January 2010 14:14:46 Kurt Roeckx, vous avez écrit :
 On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:15PM +0100, Benoit Mortier wrote:
  Those package are the whole infiniband suite, very usefull for people
  doing Debian Clusters.

 Yes, and I already contacted the list about that.  I will atleast
 need a full list of packages that should get excluded.

  http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ofed/trunk/

here is the list

dapl
howto
ibsim
ibutils
infiniband-diags
libibcm
libibcommon
libibmad
libibumad
libnes
libsdp
mstflint
ofed
opensm
perftest
qlvnictools
rds-tools
sdpnetstat
srptools
tvflash

  Upstream only test for i386, amd64, powerpc amd64, they are linux
  specific and won't work for the most on kfreebsd-* they FTBS most of
  the time on other arch / os

 It's not because upstream only tests those that it might not be
 useful and work on some other arches like ia64.  But I can
 understand that you want someone to test it before you put it
 in the archive.

   Why do you exclude so many arches.  Why wouldn't kfreebsd-* work
   for instance?  Wouldn't it be easier to just list the arches
   that are supported?
 
  sure, but how to avoid them to be compiled on kfreebsd-* ?

 Setting it to i386 ia64 amd64 powerpc should prevent it
 from getting build on kfreebsd-*.  It never got build on it.
 That however doesn't mean the porters might not look at
 why you excluded it.

okay thats mean that with this list i can set my line
Architecture: any in my package ?

Cheers
-- 
Benoit Mortier
CEO 
OpenSides logiciels libres pour entreprises : http://www.opensides.eu/
Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#565492: buildd.debian.org: add Packages-arch-specific-version for dapl

2010-01-16 Thread Benoit Mortier
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal


Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for the dapl program

%dapl: !alpha !armel !hppa !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips 
!mipsel !390 !sparc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
Benoit Mortier
CEO 
OpenSides logiciels libres pour entreprises : http://www.opensides.eu/
Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#565492: buildd.debian.org: add Packages-arch-specific-version for dapl

2010-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0100, Benoit Mortier wrote:
 Package: buildd.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 
 
 Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for the dapl program
 
 %dapl: !alpha !armel !hppa !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386 !mips 
 !mipsel !390 !sparc

Please give us some more information why you think that should
need to be added.  The package doesn't even seem to be in
unstable, nor in the NEW queue.

Why do you exclude so many arches.  Why wouldn't kfreebsd-* work
for instance?  Wouldn't it be easier to just list the arches
that are supported?


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#565492: buildd.debian.org: add Packages-arch-specific-version for dapl

2010-01-16 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Saturday 16 January 2010 13:45:00 Kurt Roeckx, vous avez écrit :
 On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0100, Benoit Mortier wrote:
  Package: buildd.debian.org
  Severity: normal
 
 
  Please add this entry to Packages-arch-specific for the dapl program
 
  %dapl: !alpha !armel !hppa !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !kfreebsd-i386
  !mips !mipsel !390 !sparc

 Please give us some more information why you think that should
 need to be added.  The package doesn't even seem to be in
 unstable, nor in the NEW queue.

Those packages are the ofed suite of packages and yes this one is not yet 
in the archive.

Those package are the whole infiniband suite, very usefull for people 
doing Debian Clusters.

http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ofed/trunk/

Upstream only test for i386, amd64, powerpc amd64, they are linux specific 
and won't work for the most on kfreebsd-* they FTBS most of the time on 
other arch / os

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libsdp

It's a mix of low level drivers and tools.

 Why do you exclude so many arches.  Why wouldn't kfreebsd-* work
 for instance?  Wouldn't it be easier to just list the arches
 that are supported?

sure, but how to avoid them to be compiled on kfreebsd-* ?

Cheers
-- 
Benoit Mortier
CEO 
OpenSides logiciels libres pour entreprises : http://www.opensides.eu/
Contributor to Gosa Project : http://gosa-project.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#565492: buildd.debian.org: add Packages-arch-specific-version for dapl

2010-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:15PM +0100, Benoit Mortier wrote:
 
 Those package are the whole infiniband suite, very usefull for people 
 doing Debian Clusters.

Yes, and I already contacted the list about that.  I will atleast
need a full list of packages that should get excluded.

 http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-ofed/trunk/
 
 Upstream only test for i386, amd64, powerpc amd64, they are linux specific 
 and won't work for the most on kfreebsd-* they FTBS most of the time on 
 other arch / os

It's not because upstream only tests those that it might not be
useful and work on some other arches like ia64.  But I can
understand that you want someone to test it before you put it
in the archive.

  Why do you exclude so many arches.  Why wouldn't kfreebsd-* work
  for instance?  Wouldn't it be easier to just list the arches
  that are supported?
 
 sure, but how to avoid them to be compiled on kfreebsd-* ?

Setting it to i386 ia64 amd64 powerpc should prevent it
from getting build on kfreebsd-*.  It never got build on it.
That however doesn't mean the porters might not look at
why you excluded it.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org