Bug#572960: #572960 - libesmtp does not check NULL bytes in commonNames of certificates

2010-07-11 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
forwarded 572960 libes...@stafford.uklinux.net
tags 572960 upstream
thanks

Brian,

I've had this bug [1] filed and given a grave status as it relates to
NULL bytes in the commonNames of certificates. I've not tried to dig
into it myself as I'm not that familiar with it but was merely
forwarding it on to you to look into. This has been assigned
CVE-2010-1192 and shows vulnerable in every version of libESMTP that is
within the Debian mirrors (1.0.3 and 1.0.4).

Regards,
Jeremy

1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572960

On 05/28/2010 01:45 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
 Hi all
 
 On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:29:42AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
 Any update on this security issue?
 
 There was an ongoing discussion about that, in [1] still. RedHat
 Bugtracker has two proposed patches too [2,3,4].
 
  [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/2637
  [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399130action=diff
  [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399131action=diff
  [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571817
 
 Some comments on this?
 
 Bests
 Salvatore




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#572960: #572960 - libesmtp does not check NULL bytes in commonNames of certificates

2010-05-27 Thread Alexander Sack
Any update on this security issue?

 - Alexander




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#572960: #572960 - libesmtp does not check NULL bytes in commonNames of certificates

2010-05-27 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi all

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:29:42AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
 Any update on this security issue?

There was an ongoing discussion about that, in [1] still. RedHat
Bugtracker has two proposed patches too [2,3,4].

 [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/2637
 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399130action=diff
 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399131action=diff
 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571817

Some comments on this?

Bests
Salvatore


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature