Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Don Armstrong writes (Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer 
Question):
 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.
...
 I believe any of these options requires a simple majority (under
 §6.1.2) but I could see arguments that A or B requires a 3:1 majority
 (under §6.1.4). If it becomes necessary, we will adhere to the
 Secretary's interpretation.

Reassigning maintainership of a package is explicitly mentioned in
6.1.2, so I think it's clear that only 1:1 is required.

Ian.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Don Armstrong writes (Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer 
Question):
 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.
...

I vote
  C B A F

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Andreas Barth writes (Re: Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer 
Question):
 * Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [121004 23:09]:
  I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.
 
  7.
  A The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
  A packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
  A including) Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org
  
  B The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
  B packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
  B including) Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
  
  C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
  C interpreter packages in Debian.
  C 
  C 8. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
  C additional co-maintainers to the python interpreter package.
 
 I vote C [AB] F.

Resending this message from Andreas to the bug report.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Don Armstrong
I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

=== BEGIN RESOLUTION ===

The technical committee was asked in #573745 to consider replacing the
current maintainer of python (Matthias Klose.) Multiple issues were
presented at the time, including a lack of communication from the
python maintainer, delays in uploads of new versions of python to
unstable/experimental, and a lack of coordination with packaging
helpers such as python-support, and python-central.

1. The communication between the python maintainer and other
individuals affected by python packaging has not been ideal. These
breakdowns appear to be rooted in an unfortunate feedback loop, of
which all parties involved share some blame.

  a) On multiple occasions, inflammatory comments regarding the
  employment and/or motives of individuals involved in python have
  been made.

  b) The target(s) of these inflammatory comments then decline to
  respond to any messages from the offending parties, and also reduce
  public communication to other parties lest further hurtful and
  demotivating comments ensue.

  c) The lack of response is taken as further confirmation of
  motives/bias, and decreases the threshold for additional terse or
  inflammatory comments. This reinforces b, completing the loop.

Neither the inflammatory comments, nor the lack of response are
acceptable outcomes.

2. No mediation was attempted by a party respected by the involved
parties until the pattern was well established and very difficult to
overcome. In the future, everyone would be better served if similar
issues were resolved in a nascent stage.

3. To resolve this issue, the committee has two options. It can either
replace the maintainer, or it can decide not to replace the
maintainer. Either decision will appear to validate one problematic
behavior or the other.

4. All relevant and interested parties have been canvassed, via the
-python list, to find what the possible teams of maintainers are for
the python interpreter packages. See
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20120403083658.gb30...@upsilon.cc
and the ensuing thread.

Therefore, 

5. The committee expresses its disappointment in the communication
problems which have lead to this issue, and strongly suggests that all
involved parties be as awesome to each other as possible. In the advent
of communication failures or problems, we request that any involved
party contact a third party (such as a member of the technical
committee) to mediate.

6. The committee requests that all major changes in the python
interpreter packages which will affect other packages in Debian be
announced on the appropriate mailing lists before they take effect so
they can be planned for and/or unplanned problems discussed.

7.
A The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
A packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
A including) Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org

B The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
B packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
B including) Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org

C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
C interpreter packages in Debian.
C 
C 8. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
C additional co-maintainers to the python interpreter package.


=== END RESOLUTION ===

I believe any of these options requires a simple majority (under
§6.1.2) but I could see arguments that A or B requires a 3:1 majority
(under §6.1.4). If it becomes necessary, we will adhere to the
Secretary's interpretation.


Don Armstrong

-- 
I learned really early the difference between knowing the name of
something and knowing something
 -- Richard Feynman What is Science Phys. Teach. 7(6) 1969

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012, Don Armstrong wrote:
 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

I vote C [AB] F.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Junkies were all knitted together in a loose global macrame, the
intercontinental freemasonry of narcotics.
 -- Bruce Sterling, _Holy Fire_ p257

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:

 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

I vote CBAF.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/


pgpKdv6qyrRPK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Bdale Garbee
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:

 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

I vote C [AB] F.

Bdale


pgp5QIYkm1Ehd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [121004 23:09]:
 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

 7.
 A The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
 A packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
 A including) Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org
 
 B The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
 B packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
 B including) Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
 
 C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
 C interpreter packages in Debian.
 C 
 C 8. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
 C additional co-maintainers to the python interpreter package.

I vote C [AB] F.


Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121004222439.gg26...@mails.so.argh.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#573745: Call for votes on Python Maintainer Question

2012-10-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:05:53PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
 I call for a vote on the following resolution to #573745.

I vote CBFA.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature