Bug#577494: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2012-07-14 Thread Robert Millan
2012/7/5 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
 I guessed that this (and other low-severity bugs) were flagged like this
 simply because they are usertagged with 'kfreebsd'?  In which case that
 may be a bit OTT.

Oh, I see

-- 
Robert Millan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#577494: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2012-07-05 Thread Robert Millan
Dear release team,

2012/6/30 DDPOMail robot ddpom...@qa.debian.org:
 === freebsd-utils:
 = 1 Release Goals bug(s):
 - #577494 http://bugs.debian.org/577494
   include ktrdump and vmstat
   Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures

Please could you give more details on which part of #577494 is
considered a release goal? The bug title mentions ktrdump and vmstat,
two utilities which are seldom used. The bug log also mentions arp,
perhaps it's arp you're concerned with?

arp I would understand, but it sounds really strange that you consider
ktrdump and vmstat as mandatory for kfreebsd-* to qualify as release
architectures.

-- 
Robert Millan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#577494: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2012-07-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul  5, 2012 at 21:39:18 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:

 Dear release team,
 
 2012/6/30 DDPOMail robot ddpom...@qa.debian.org:
  === freebsd-utils:
  = 1 Release Goals bug(s):
  - #577494 http://bugs.debian.org/577494
include ktrdump and vmstat
Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures
 
 Please could you give more details on which part of #577494 is
 considered a release goal? The bug title mentions ktrdump and vmstat,
 two utilities which are seldom used. The bug log also mentions arp,
 perhaps it's arp you're concerned with?
 
 arp I would understand, but it sounds really strange that you consider
 ktrdump and vmstat as mandatory for kfreebsd-* to qualify as release
 architectures.
 
I don't think the release team has anything to do with this?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#577494: Possible problems in your Debian packages

2012-07-05 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 05/07/12 20:39, Robert Millan wrote:
 2012/6/30 DDPOMail robot ddpom...@qa.debian.org:
 === freebsd-utils:
 = 1 Release Goals bug(s):
 - #577494 http://bugs.debian.org/577494
   include ktrdump and vmstat
   Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures
 
 Please could you give more details on which part of #577494 is
 considered a release goal?

I guessed that this (and other low-severity bugs) were flagged like this
simply because they are usertagged with 'kfreebsd'?  In which case that
may be a bit OTT.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org