On 11-07-26 at 11:41am, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:59:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > severity 578947 serious > > severity 578948 serious > > thanks > > > I dare lower the severity, since I also cannot reproduce. > > > > Also, I wonder why this was filed against older versions: > > > > cipux-task 3.4.0.7-1 was succeeded by 2.4.0.7-2, and cipux-rpc > > 3.4.0.6-1 by 3.4.0.8-1, both more than a year ago. > > > > I believe it is in _unstable_ Perl is upgraded, not stable, right? > > Yes, certainly :) > > It would have helped if you'd sent your questions to me instead of > just the bug log. The first reply I got was the recent 'closing as > unreproducible.'
Oh, sorry!! > I filed the bugs against the then-current versions in April 2010 when > we were first preparing for Perl 5.12 in unstable. > > We didn't quite make it for the squeeze release, so the transition > actually happened a year later. Ah, that helps explain: I probably didn't notice the _year_ when looking at those dates :-/ What was also involved is that for some odd reason I seem to not receive bugreports filed against CipUX packages. Probably something in the setup of our project mailinglist. > > Still interested in investigating this further, though: Memory leaks > > may occur in particular combinations of libraries, so the real > > problem may be somewhere else still lurking. > > > > So please provide build logs for closer examination. > > I still happened to have old failing build logs from May 2010 with > Perl 5.12.1 around, so attached in case you still care. > > I'm not in a position to try and reproduce this myself right now, and > if it's working for everybody now I'm happy to keep the bugs closed. Thanks for the logs! I find it more sensible to keep the bugs closed. We can reopen if it occurs again. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature