Bug#581728: balazar3: FTBFS: /bin/sh: rsync: not found

2010-05-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Source: balazar3
Version: 0.1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi,

your package FTBFS:
| mkdir build
| rsync -r --link-dest=. --exclude=build --exclude=debian . build/3d ; rsync -r 
--link-dest=. --exclude=build --exclude=debian . build/2d ;
| /bin/sh: rsync: not found
| /bin/sh: rsync: not found
| make: *** [prepare-stamp] Error 127

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=balazar3

Mraw,
KiBi.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#581728: balazar3: FTBFS: /bin/sh: rsync: not found

2010-05-15 Thread Vincent Bernat 
OoO  Peu avant  le début  de l'après-midi  du samedi  15 mai  2010, vers
13:00, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org disait :

 your package FTBFS:
 | mkdir build
 | rsync -r --link-dest=. --exclude=build --exclude=debian . build/3d ; rsync 
 -r --link-dest=. --exclude=build --exclude=debian . build/2d ;
 | /bin/sh: rsync: not found
 | /bin/sh: rsync: not found
 | make: *** [prepare-stamp] Error 127

 Full build logs:
   https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=balazar3

Thanks for  the notice!  I  am moving rsync from  Build-Depends-Indep to
Build-Depends to  fix this.  I also  had a problem  with my debian/rules
with a binary-arch which was empty.

However, the  logs show  that debian/rules build  is called.  Policy 7.7
says that Build-Depends-Indep should be  satisfied when such a target is
called. Am I wrong?
-- 
printk(ufs_read_super: fucking Sun blows me\n);
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/fs/ufs/ufs_super.c


pgps2CIgfJGn7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#581728: balazar3: FTBFS: /bin/sh: rsync: not found

2010-05-15 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 14:08:57 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:

 However, the  logs show  that debian/rules build  is called.  Policy 7.7
 says that Build-Depends-Indep should be  satisfied when such a target is
 called. Am I wrong?

Long-standing issue.  See #374029.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature