Bug#585801: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#585801: fixed in chromium-browser 5.0.375.86~r49890-1
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > On 06/26/2010 09:30 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > It also speeds up the passage through buildds afaik > > No, I think this doesn't happen. You’re right, of course[1]. Maybe they should, but that’s a separate story. Thanks for setting me straight. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585801: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#585801: fixed in chromium-browser 5.0.375.86~r49890-1
On 06/26/2010 09:30 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > It also speeds up the passage through buildds afaik No, I think this doesn't happen. Cheers, Giuseppe. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#585801: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#585801: fixed in chromium-browser 5.0.375.86~r49890-1
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > with urgency medium or high we speed up the migration to testing. > chromium isn't in testing, so this isn't necessary for now :) Ah, I see. :) It also speeds up the passage through buildds afaik, but anyway, as long as chromium is not part of a release I don’t think anyone needs to care. Thanks for the explanation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585801: [Pkg-chromium-maint] Bug#585801: fixed in chromium-browser 5.0.375.86~r49890-1
On 06/25/2010 10:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > For the future: wouldn’t security fixes like this warrant urgency=medium? with urgency medium or high we speed up the migration to testing. chromium isn't in testing, so this isn't necessary for now :) Cheers, Giuseppe signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
