Bug#587481: intent to NMU
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:04:51PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Jan Hauke Rahm [2010-07-30 12:00]: > > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I intent to upload a 0day NMU to fix this bug. > > > The debdiff is available at: > > > http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/syscp-1.4.2.1-2_1.4.2.1-2.1.patch > > > > if you consider it necessary, do so. SysCP won't be part of squeeze and > > I'm even thinking of its removal since Froxlor (a fork of SysCP) has way > > more development going on and fixed a many bugs already. There is an ITP > > for it and I'm discussing this with the relevant people. > > I can wait even though in the meantime it wouldn't hurt to get security > issues > fixed. Also please note such things in the bug report next time so other > people are aware of this. You didn't reply to this bug at all until now. *gna*, sorry, I thought I did. Just came back from a 9-day conference. Got it all a bit messed up. I'll update on SysCP as soon as I have more info. Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahmwww.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundationwww.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#587481: intent to NMU
Hi, * Jan Hauke Rahm [2010-07-30 12:00]: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi, > > I intent to upload a 0day NMU to fix this bug. > > The debdiff is available at: > > http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/syscp-1.4.2.1-2_1.4.2.1-2.1.patch > > if you consider it necessary, do so. SysCP won't be part of squeeze and > I'm even thinking of its removal since Froxlor (a fork of SysCP) has way > more development going on and fixed a many bugs already. There is an ITP > for it and I'm discussing this with the relevant people. I can wait even though in the meantime it wouldn't hurt to get security issues fixed. Also please note such things in the bug report next time so other people are aware of this. You didn't reply to this bug at all until now. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpsL7BS8qC97.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#587481: intent to NMU
Hi Nico, On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > I intent to upload a 0day NMU to fix this bug. > The debdiff is available at: > http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/syscp-1.4.2.1-2_1.4.2.1-2.1.patch if you consider it necessary, do so. SysCP won't be part of squeeze and I'm even thinking of its removal since Froxlor (a fork of SysCP) has way more development going on and fixed a many bugs already. There is an ITP for it and I'm discussing this with the relevant people. Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahmwww.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundationwww.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#587481: Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of syscp to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs (as well as security issue)
Dear Debian maintainer, ("oh no, not him again"...) The syscp Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 576151 (and maybe other similar bugs). The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but, unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report. We really should prevent translators from translating..:-) So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I with an NMU intent...:-) In case you can't update your package, I hereby propose, as part of a more general action of the Debian i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload for syscp in order to fix this as well as all pending translations for the debconf templates. During this process, I may also fix the security issue described in #587481 by uploading the new upstream version. Of course, as you seem pretty active on that package, an upload by you would also be OK...as long as it allows a round of translation updates. Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider building NMU's for such issues even though they're obviously non critical. The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it or if I don't receive any answer in 10 days) is roughly the following: Monday, July 26, 2010 : send this notice Friday, July 30, 2010 : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you (maintainer) CC'ed Thursday, August 05, 2010 : deadline for receiving translation updates Friday, August 06, 2010 : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/2-day send the NMU patch to the BTS Sunday, August 08, 2010 : NMU reaches incoming If you intent to upload yourself, please discuss with me. I propose handling a translation update round and I can handle it myself for you. That will just require a few days. In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for syscp and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix any issue potentially introduced by my upload. Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this process. If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#587481: intent to NMU
Hi, I intent to upload a 0day NMU to fix this bug. The debdiff is available at: http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/syscp-1.4.2.1-2_1.4.2.1-2.1.patch Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgp8fwDqahPpd.pgp Description: PGP signature