Bug#592350: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#592350: (no subject)
Hello I want to help with maintenance. Here's my latest work: http://gnu.ethz.ch/debian/gphoto2/libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-1.dsc http://gnu.ethz.ch/debian/gphoto2/gphoto2_2.4.10-1.dsc Hope that helps. Gurkan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592350: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#592350: (no subject)
Hi, André Wöbbeking woebbek...@web.de (28/08/2010): I wonder why this package wasn't updated before. 2.4.5 is more than one year old. There is even 2.4.10 now. see the RFH (Request For Help) we already have on libgphoto2, we need more hands to work on this set of packages, anyone is welcome to join the team and help. The team was created specifically for that purpose. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#592350: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#592350: (no subject)
On Tuesday 07 September 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: see the RFH (Request For Help) we already have on libgphoto2, we need more hands to work on this set of packages, anyone is welcome to join the team and help. The team was created specifically for that purpose. What kind of help do you mean? And couldn't you just copy the package control files (I don't know the correct term) from ubuntu? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592350: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#592350: (no subject)
André Wöbbeking woebbek...@web.de (07/09/2010): What kind of help do you mean? Something like, well, maintenance? Like making sure everything is fine from a packaging point of view, merging new upstream releases and adapting the packaging accordingly. Fixing bugs. Etc. And couldn't you just copy the package control files (I don't know the correct term) from ubuntu? The question is rather: why aren't ubuntu folks working directly on the debian packages. “just copying” is a good recipe for a big failures. They might have Ubuntu-specific changes. They might have done things wrong (shit happens). In all cases, that means specific checking. See “maintenance” above. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature