Bug#594974: dovecot-common: buggy error message in /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver

2010-08-31 Thread Clint Adams 
Package: dovecot-common
Version: 1:1.2.13-1
Severity: normal

Aside from the misleading use of the phrase process group, I think
this patch makes slightly more sense.

--- src/lib/restrict-access.c.orig  2010-08-30 22:08:26.887870797 -0400
+++ src/lib/restrict-access.c   2010-08-30 22:08:41.371893994 -0400
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
process group set to %s instead of %s),
get_gid_str(primary_gid), 
get_uid_str(geteuid()),
get_gid_str(getgid()), get_gid_str(getegid()),
-   get_gid_str(primary_gid), 
get_uid_str(geteuid()));
+   get_gid_str(primary_gid), 
get_gid_str(getegid()));
}
return;
}



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#594974: dovecot-common: buggy error message in /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver

2010-08-31 Thread Timo Sirainen 
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 02:10 +, Clint Adams wrote:
 Aside from the misleading use of the phrase process group, I think
 this patch makes slightly more sense.

Yeah .. I'm not sure what would be better for process group. Maybe
process's group or process's effective group or something..

 - get_gid_str(primary_gid), 
 get_uid_str(geteuid()));
 + get_gid_str(primary_gid), 
 get_gid_str(getegid()));

Committed to upstream v1.2 and v2.0 hg.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org