Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
+1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience
of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month,
sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that
people miss the occasion when something isn't normal.
This is still unfixed in sid, though.
Indeed so.
In any case, since I have rolled this out on some servers I manage,
I thought I may as well confirm that a patch (attached) adopted from
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=commit;h=219ef9a6c6a5e6bd1747bca4d13b72ae95ff9512
applied on squeeze seems to work okay.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)
diff -urN mdadm-3.1.4/debian/checkarray mdadm-3.1.4.fixed//debian/checkarray
--- mdadm-3.1.4/debian/checkarray 2010-09-03 09:44:09.0 +0100
+++ mdadm-3.1.4.fixed//debian/checkarray 2011-08-10 17:08:34.0 +0100
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
wait=$((wait - 1))
resync_pid=$(ps -ef | awk -v dev=$array 'BEGIN { pattern = ^\\[ dev _resync]$ } $8 ~ pattern { print $2 }')
if [ -n $resync_pid ]; then
- echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2
+ [ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2
ionice -p $resync_pid $arg
break
fi
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On 13.09.2011 19:01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [] This is still unfixed in sid, though. Indeed so. In any case, since I have rolled this out on some servers I manage, I thought I may as well confirm that a patch (attached) adopted from http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=commit;h=219ef9a6c6a5e6bd1747bca4d13b72ae95ff9512 applied on squeeze seems to work okay. We're preparing upload of new (upstream) version to unstable. Once it hits testing we'll request a stable update for squeeze. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that people miss the occasion when something isn't normal. This is still unfixed in sid, though. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. I'd tend to allow it if you show me a successful piuparts run in stable with the new version (or if I get around to do the same thing). And, more importantly, this needs to be fixed in unstable first. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:36:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: - Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? Let's say you have 500 servers, then you get 500 useless warning emails for no valid reasons. Yes, that's quite annoying, and I do believe worth an update for large installations. Patching by had is even more a What's your argument against the update if not Julien the worthyness, which I believe is a mater of opinion depending on the number of server one has to do admin on? +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that people miss the occasion when something isn't normal. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems *** important disclaimer: by sending an email to any address, that will eventually cause it to end up in my inbox without much interaction, you are agreeing that: - i am by definition, the intended recipient - all information in the email is mine to do with as i see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. in particular, i may quote it on usenet. - i may take the contents as representing the views of your company. - this overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message. digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
- Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? Let's say you have 500 servers, then you get 500 useless warning emails for no valid reasons. Yes, that's quite annoying, and I do believe worth an update for large installations. Patching by had is even more a What's your argument against the update if not Julien the worthyness, which I believe is a mater of opinion depending on the number of server one has to do admin on? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
Hello to the release team! I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598957 It seems that there is a consensus for this fix: -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 I understand that this isn't a RC bug per say. But when you run a large server farm, receiving a mail from each server every month can really be annoying. So there must be a huge number of server administrators annoyed every 1st Sunday of the month by this issue since they upgraded to Squeeze. Martin f. Krafft (Madduck) said that he wouldn't be available to manage the issue (as he is moving home), and already expressed his agreement for the NMU. Would the release team accept that I do this tiny modification, and NMU it to squeeze-proposed-updates, to avoid the useless warning annoyance sent by email every month? Looking forward to have your opinion, Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I do not intend to fix the issue about the auto-read-only thing with this upload, unless others make a clear point that it should be, and that there's a *consensus* about it. Also, it doesn't affect everyone, while the one scheduling class thing does. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 14:52:31 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hello to the release team! I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598957 It seems that there is a consensus for this fix: -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
