Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:31:56 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: However, given the past history and the tight coupling with gdb, I suspect 0.05-1 in wheezy is also affected. Tagging 'sid' for now (and I hope that's the right thing to do), but it would be good to verify if it currently builds in wheezy on armel. Bad news: It doesn't. Good news: Or maybe it does? I just tried 0.05-1 in the wheezy chroot on abel.d.o (with File::Which and Capture::Tiny in ~/perl/lib): (wheezy)gregoa@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/perl/lib perl Makefile.PL Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Writing Makefile for Devel::bt Writing MYMETA.yml (wheezy)gregoa@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/perl/lib make cp lib/Devel/bt.pm blib/lib/Devel/bt.pm /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl/5.14/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/share/perl/5.14/ExtUtils/typemap bt.xs bt.xsc mv bt.xsc bt.c cc -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBIAN -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -g -DVERSION=\0.05\ -DXS_VERSION=\0.05\ -fPIC -I/usr/lib/perl/5.14/CORE bt.c Running Mkbootstrap for Devel::bt () chmod 644 bt.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/Devel/bt/bt.so cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector bt.o -o blib/arch/auto/Devel/bt/bt.so \ \ chmod 755 blib/arch/auto/Devel/bt/bt.so cp bt.bs blib/arch/auto/Devel/bt/bt.bs chmod 644 blib/arch/auto/Devel/bt/bt.bs Manifying blib/man3/Devel::bt.3pm (wheezy)gregoa@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/perl/lib make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/basic.t ... 1/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGABRT' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '' # doesn't match '(?^:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 7/? # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7. t/basic.t ... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/7 subtests t/release-eol.t . skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-no-tabs.t . skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-pod-syntax.t .. skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing Test Summary Report --- t/basic.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 7 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=4, Tests=7, 15 wallclock secs ( 0.27 usr 0.02 sys + 2.20 cusr 0.46 csys = 2.95 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/4 test programs. 1/7 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Or does it? Without any changes: (wheezy)gregoa@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/perl/lib prove --blib --verbose t/basic.t t/basic.t .. ok 1 - perl backtrace for SIGABRT ok 2 - perl backtrace for SIGFPE ok 3 - perl backtrace for SIGILL ok 4 - perl backtrace for SIGQUIT ok 5 - perl backtrace for SIGSEGV ok 6 - perl backtrace for SIGBUS ok 7 - perl backtrace for SIGTRAP 1..7 ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=7, 13 wallclock secs ( 0.27 usr 0.00 sys + 1.68 cusr 0.44 csys = 2.39 CPU) Result: PASS Let's try some more times: Running the prove ... 10 times in a loop: -- 10 times PASS Running make test 10 times in a loop: -- 10 times PASS A last loop with 100 iterations of prove --blib t/basic.t: failures at run 14 (SIGILL), 34 (SIGBUS), otherwise PASS. So we have something like 121 PASSs and 3 FAILs (with 1 failure each and in different (!) subtests). Great. source_version gdb_version perl_version result notes 0.05-1 7.2-1 5.10.1-14 FAIL 5 failures 0.05-1 7.2-1 5.10.1-18 FAIL 5 failures 0.05-1 7.3-1 5.12.4-4 OK 0.05-1 7.3-1+b1 5.14.2-3 OK 0.06-1 7.4really-1 5.14.2-7 FAIL 1 failure 0.06-1 7.4.1-1.1 5.14.2-9 FAIL 4 failures 0.05-1 7.4.1-1.1 5.14.2-12 121:30/1 failures /* Just for fun I ran t/basic.t from 0.06-1 in a sid chroot on my adm64 machine 100 times: 100x PASS. */ BTW, gdb_7.4.1-1.1 fixes LinuxThreads signal handling on GNU/kFreeBSD, so it might be worth a try to reschedule this on kfreebsd-amd64 which has been failing consistently up to and including 7.4really-1 with related symptoms. armel was enough for me for now :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Cat Stevens: Cats In The Cradle signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
severity 602668 serious tag 602668 sid thanks On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:15:46AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:54:58PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: severity 602668 important clone 602668 -1 retitle -1 gdb: 7.2 falsely (?) shows stack corruption on armel reassign -1 gdb 7.2-1 block 602668 with -1 thanks On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:15:01PM +, Hector Oron wrote: Package: libdevel-bt-perl Version: 0.05-1 Severity: serious It's never built on armel yet, so downgrading. Just noticed this looking at the pkg-perl 'dashboard': In the 'meantime' it seems that libdevel-bt-perl was once build already too on armel. But 0.06-1 did not succeed again[1]. [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libdevel-bt-perlarch=armel That makes this RC for 0.06-1 and blocks its testing migration. However, given the past history and the tight coupling with gdb, I suspect 0.05-1 in wheezy is also affected. Tagging 'sid' for now (and I hope that's the right thing to do), but it would be good to verify if it currently builds in wheezy on armel. FWIW, here's a summary of the build logs. The failure mode seems to have changed a bit with the gdb 7.4 builds: the logs now indicate an empty backtrace instead of a corrupted one. source_version gdb_version perl_version result notes 0.05-1 7.2-1 5.10.1-14 FAIL 5 failures 0.05-1 7.2-1 5.10.1-18 FAIL 5 failures 0.05-1 7.3-1 5.12.4-4 OK 0.05-1 7.3-1+b1 5.14.2-3 OK 0.06-1 7.4really-1 5.14.2-7 FAIL 1 failure 0.06-1 7.4.1-1.1 5.14.2-9 FAIL 4 failures BTW, gdb_7.4.1-1.1 fixes LinuxThreads signal handling on GNU/kFreeBSD, so it might be worth a try to reschedule this on kfreebsd-amd64 which has been failing consistently up to and including 7.4really-1 with related symptoms. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Hi, These two CPAN Testers reports (on amd64) look a bit like the build failure we are experiencing: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/c601e674-9a7d-11e1-98bb-209ec6a682bc http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f03c7e5a-9ae0-11e1-9b6c-a51c4701def4 Unfortunately, the reports don't mention the version of GDB. Note that there are no useful failure reports on CPAN Testers on armel, mainly due to the fact the relevant tests are skipped due to gdb not being installed. Florian, could you please have a look one of these days? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Hi On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:54:58PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: severity 602668 important clone 602668 -1 retitle -1 gdb: 7.2 falsely (?) shows stack corruption on armel reassign -1 gdb 7.2-1 block 602668 with -1 thanks On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:15:01PM +, Hector Oron wrote: Package: libdevel-bt-perl Version: 0.05-1 Severity: serious It's never built on armel yet, so downgrading. Just noticed this looking at the pkg-perl 'dashboard': In the 'meantime' it seems that libdevel-bt-perl was once build already too on armel. But 0.06-1 did not succeed again[1]. [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libdevel-bt-perlarch=armel (No further investigation done so far) Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
severity 602668 important clone 602668 -1 retitle -1 gdb: 7.2 falsely (?) shows stack corruption on armel reassign -1 gdb 7.2-1 block 602668 with -1 thanks On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:15:01PM +, Hector Oron wrote: Package: libdevel-bt-perl Version: 0.05-1 Severity: serious It's never built on armel yet, so downgrading. t/basic.t (Wstat: 1280 Tests: 5 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 1-5 This is because gdb thinks the stack gets corrupted somewhere between perl_run() and Perl_runops_standard(): abel% gdb perl GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian [...] Reading symbols from /usr/bin/perl...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) br perl_run Breakpoint 1 at 0x898c (gdb) br Perl_runops_standard Function Perl_runops_standard not defined. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 2 (Perl_runops_standard) pending. (gdb) run -e 1 Starting program: /usr/bin/perl -e 1 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Breakpoint 1, 0x400740c4 in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.10 (gdb) bt #0 0x400740c4 in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.10 #1 0x8b9c in main () (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 2, 0x400cead4 in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.10 (gdb) bt #0 0x400cead4 in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.10 #1 0x400743f4 in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.10 #2 0x00011008 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0x0 #3 0x00011008 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) This seems to be a regression in gdb itself: 7.2-1 from sid shows the above stack corruption, 7.0.1-2 from squeeze doesn't with the same perl binary. (I tested this on abel by copying /usr/bin/gdb from the sid chroot to my home directory and running it in the squeeze one.) Cloning, reassigning and blocking. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
tag 602668 + confirmed thanks On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:15:01 +, Hector Oron wrote: Your package fails to build on armel with following error: I can reproduce the test failures on abel (armel) and asdfasdf (kfreebsd-amd64) when running the tests manually: armel: (sid)gre...@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/src/perl5lib/lib/ make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/basic.t ... 1/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGABRT' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x4023646c in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # #1 0x40027b48 in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x30373230 in ?? () # #4 0x30373230 in ?? () # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 2/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGFPE' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x4023646c in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # #1 0x40027b48 in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x31373230 in ?? () # #4 0x31373230 in ?? () # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 3/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGILL' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x4023646c in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # #1 0x40027b48 in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x31373230 in ?? () # #4 0x31373230 in ?? () # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 4/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGQUIT' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x4023646c in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # #1 0x40027b48 in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x32373230 in ?? () # #4 0x32373230 in ?? () # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 5/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGSEGV' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x4023646c in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # #1 0x40027b48 in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x33373230 in ?? () # #4 0x33373230 in ?? () # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 5. t/basic.t ... Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500) Failed 5/5 subtests t/release-eol.t . skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-no-tabs.t . skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing t/release-pod-syntax.t .. skipped: these tests are for release candidate testing Test Summary Report --- t/basic.t (Wstat: 1280 Tests: 5 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 1-5 Non-zero exit status: 5 Files=4, Tests=5, 9 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.05 sys + 1.76 cusr 0.31 csys = 2.33 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/4 test programs. 5/5 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 (sid)gre...@abel:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ kfreebsd-amd64: (sid)gre...@asdfasdf:~/src/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05$ PERL5LIB=~/src/perl5lib/lib make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/basic.t ... 1/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGABRT' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 2/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGFPE' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x0008012cc938 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.0.1 # #1 0x000807f71f2d in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x000801020244 in __pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 3/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGILL' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x0008012cc938 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.0.1 # #1 0x000807f71f2d in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x000801020244 in __pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 4/? # Failed test 'perl backtrace for SIGQUIT' # at t/basic.t line 26. # '#0 0x0008012cc938 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.0.1 # #1 0x000807f71f2d in backtrace (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:183 # #2 signal_handler (sig=value optimized out) at bt.xs:190 # #3 0x000801020244 in __pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 # ' # doesn't match '(?-xism:\bperl_run\b)' t/basic.t ... 5/? #
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Package: libdevel-bt-perl Version: 0.05-1 Severity: serious Hello, Your package fails to build on armel with following error: Test Summary Report --- t/basic.t (Wstat: 1280 Tests: 5 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 1-5 Non-zero exit status: 5 Files=4, Tests=5, 9 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.02 sys + 1.81 cusr 0.38 csys = 2.42 CPU) Result: FAIL make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-libdevel-bt-perl_0.05-1-armel-gAnCHp/libdevel-bt-perl-0.05' dh_auto_test: make -j1 test returned exit code 2 make: *** [build] Error 29 Full buildlog at: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libdevel-bt-perl;ver=0.05-1;arch=armel;stamp=1288778427 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
