Bug#609593: wireshark depends on package of extra priority

2011-01-10 Thread Rafael Cunha de Almeida
Package: wireshark
Version: 1.2.11-5
Severity: serious

Section 2.5 of debian policy states that packages MUST NOT depend on
packages with lower priority values (excluding build-time dependencies).
However, wireshark is optional and depends on the extra package
libc-ares2.  wireshark also depends on libkrb53, which is also extra on
i386, but according to #609027 it seems that dependency will be removed.

Regards,
Rafael



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#609593: wireshark depends on package of extra priority

2011-01-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 609593 normal
thanks

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:30 +, Rafael Cunha de Almeida wrote:
 Section 2.5 of debian policy states that packages MUST NOT depend on
 packages with lower priority values (excluding build-time dependencies).
 However, wireshark is optional and depends on the extra package
 libc-ares2.  wireshark also depends on libkrb53, which is also extra on
 i386, but according to #609027 it seems that dependency will be removed.

Thanks for your report.

Whilst this is technically a violation of a MUST in Policy, the
requirements of the optional and extra priorities aren't really enforced
any more; see
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sidlist=main-only-priorityarch=ANY for 
an indication of how many packages don't comply with Policy in this respect.

Part of this (the requirement for optional packages not to conflict with
other optional packages) is discussed in debian-policy bug #477990.

I'm downgrading this report to normal severity, although the maintainer
may choose to modify that; in any case, this is certainly not release
critical for Squeeze.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#609593: wireshark depends on package of extra priority

2011-01-10 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi,

I'm aware of the priority problem.
I think libc-ares2 can become optional after fixing #476735 and we will be fine.

Cheers,
Balint

2011/1/10 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
 severity 609593 normal
 thanks

 On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:30 +, Rafael Cunha de Almeida wrote:
 Section 2.5 of debian policy states that packages MUST NOT depend on
 packages with lower priority values (excluding build-time dependencies).
 However, wireshark is optional and depends on the extra package
 libc-ares2.  wireshark also depends on libkrb53, which is also extra on
 i386, but according to #609027 it seems that dependency will be removed.

 Thanks for your report.

 Whilst this is technically a violation of a MUST in Policy, the
 requirements of the optional and extra priorities aren't really enforced
 any more; see
 http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sidlist=main-only-priorityarch=ANY 
 for an indication of how many packages don't comply with Policy in this 
 respect.

 Part of this (the requirement for optional packages not to conflict with
 other optional packages) is discussed in debian-policy bug #477990.

 I'm downgrading this report to normal severity, although the maintainer
 may choose to modify that; in any case, this is certainly not release
 critical for Squeeze.

 Regards,

 Adam







--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org