Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 22:37 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: On 22 March 2011 22:42, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Any news on either of the uploads? Apologies for the delay. RL is throwing up some issues which are taking my time at the moment. I hope to get to it at the weekend. No worries; thanks for the update. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 22 March 2011 22:42, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Any news on either of the uploads? Apologies for the delay. RL is throwing up some issues which are taking my time at the moment. I hope to get to it at the weekend. Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Hi, On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:57 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue with the original was the lack of explanation. On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 23:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 23:43 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable? The oldstable diff looks fine, thanks. Any news on either of the uploads? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Hi Adam, On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2 +squeeze1, which is conventional. Sure. This will be my first contribution directly to stable or oldstable, as I am sure you can tell. I've updated the oldstable package to also conform. There was no mention of the convention in the Developers' Reference[1]. Is this worth a bug report? - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh --with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian in experimental). I've dropped it, assuming you are correct, and asked Jakub Wilk, who prepared the original NMU, to confirm. Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. That's fine (and the right way to do it). Sorry, but your answer is ambigious. Would you like the extra two bugs opened (and closed)? I would also suggest that the Developers' Reference could be improved to confirm this, one way or the other. Regards Jeff [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable tesseract_2.03-2+lenny1.debdiff Description: Binary data tesseract_2.04-2+squeeze1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 22:57 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: Hi Adam, On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2 +squeeze1, which is conventional. Sure. This will be my first contribution directly to stable or oldstable, as I am sure you can tell. I've updated the oldstable package to also conform. Thanks. There was no mention of the convention in the Developers' Reference[1]. Is this worth a bug report? I'm planning on working on the wording in the DevRef relating to stable uploads soon anyway, to ensure it matches current practice; I'll bear it mind. The reasoning behind using + is to ensure that the newly uploaded version is higher than any binNMUs which may exist in stable (i.e. 2.04-2squeeze1 2.0.4-2+b1). It also saves us having to check whether there was ever a 2.03-3 in the archive previously. - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh --with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian in experimental). I've dropped it, assuming you are correct, and asked Jakub Wilk, who prepared the original NMU, to confirm. Okay, thanks. For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue with the original was the lack of explanation. Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. That's fine (and the right way to do it). Sorry, but your answer is ambigious. Would you like the extra two bugs opened (and closed)? Sorry, that referred to the current situation. There's no need to open more than one bug to track a particular issue in a given package; the BTS is more than capable of tracking which versions of a package (and by extension which suites) the bug applies to assuming it has supplied with the correct version information in terms of fixed / found versions. #612032 was already corrected tagged for the stable version (albeit as a side-effect of it being the unstable version at the time the bug was reported); I've just sent the relevant control@ command to mark the oldstable version as affected. I would also suggest that the Developers' Reference could be improved to confirm this, one way or the other. I don't think this is an issue specific to stable; it's a general feature of BTS version tracking so if further documentation is needed it should be outside of any stable update discussion. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
* Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com, 2011-03-06, 22:57: - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh --with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian in experimental). I've dropped it, assuming you are correct, and asked Jakub Wilk, who prepared the original NMU, to confirm. Adam is correct, I bumped b-d to shut up lintian: $ lintian --ftp-master-rejects tesseract_2.04-2.dsc E: tesseract source: missing-build-dependency quilt (= 0.46-7~) (missing-build-dependency is no longer on ftp-master's list, but it was there at least until a few days before I uploaded the NMU.) Sorry for dissatisfactory changelog entry. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 6 March 2011 23:56, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Adam is correct, I bumped b-d to shut up lintian: Thanks for confirming that. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Attached are debdiffs to fix #612032 for the relevant packages in lenny and squeeze. Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable? Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. Regards Jeff Ratcliffe tesseract_2.03-3.debdiff Description: Binary data tesseract_2.04-3.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 23:43 +0100, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: Attached are debdiffs to fix #612032 for the relevant packages in lenny and squeeze. Thanks for working on this. Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable? The oldstable diff looks fine, thanks. The squeeze update will need a couple of small changes: - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2 +squeeze1, which is conventional. - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh --with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian in experimental). Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. That's fine (and the right way to do it). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Dear maintainer, Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites through point releases: lenny (5.0.9) squeeze (6.0.1) Please arrange to backport your fix and liase with the release team for permission to upload. I will happily assist you if the patch is straightforward and you need help or lack time. For details of this process and the rationale, please see the original announcement [1] and my blog post [2]. 1: 201101232332.11736.th...@debian.org 2: http://deb.li/prsc Thanks, with his security hat on: -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
