Bug#613431: status update?

2013-09-05 Thread Olly Betts
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:17:48PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
 What's the status of your packaging? wxWidgets 2.9.5 has been
 released roughly a month ago. I would like to update aegisub to 3.x
 branch, since 2.x branch is no longer maintained by upstream
 maintainers.

I've been on vacation, and then my wx packaging energies were taken with
sorting out wx 2.8 bugs which were reported while I was away.

Hopefully I should be on to 2.9 soon though.

 ABI bumps in libwxWidgets would mainly be a problem for reverse
 dependencies. From my perspective (maintainer of a reverse
 depdendency) multiple ABI bumps in wxWidgets are the lesser evil
 compared to being totally unsupported by upstream developers.

wx 2.8 isn't totally unsupported upstream.  It's true that there haven't
been any wx 2.8 releases for ages, but there are still commits to the
branch - last was 18 days ago as I write this:

https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/commits/WX_2_8_BRANCH

 Please note, that having software with an unstable API in Debian is
 not that uncommon (enlightenment [by now stable], libfso*,
 libradare*, ...).  It obviously increases the maintenance work,
 though.

The increased maintenance work is a real issue.  I'm the only active
member of the wx maintenance team at the moment, with limited time to
devote to it, and wx has a lot of reverse dependencies (many without an
active maintainer judging from the number of NMUs I had to do to get rid
of wx 2.6).

Cheers,
Olly


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#613431: status update?

2013-09-04 Thread Sebastian Reichel
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:32:51AM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
  ABI bumps in libwxWidgets would mainly be a problem for reverse
  dependencies. From my perspective (maintainer of a reverse
  depdendency) multiple ABI bumps in wxWidgets are the lesser evil
  compared to being totally unsupported by upstream developers.
 
 wx 2.8 isn't totally unsupported upstream.  It's true that there haven't
 been any wx 2.8 releases for ages, but there are still commits to the
 branch - last was 18 days ago as I write this: [...]

I was talking about the reverse dependencies here. Reverse
dependencies, which have switched to wx 2.9 cannot be upgraded
in Debian and old releases are no longer supported by upstream.

-- Sebastian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#613431: status update?

2013-08-11 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Olly,

What's the status of your packaging? wxWidgets 2.9.5 has been
released roughly a month ago. I would like to update aegisub to 3.x
branch, since 2.x branch is no longer maintained by upstream
maintainers.

ABI bumps in libwxWidgets would mainly be a problem for reverse
dependencies. From my perspective (maintainer of a reverse
depdendency) multiple ABI bumps in wxWidgets are the lesser evil
compared to being totally unsupported by upstream developers.

Please note, that having software with an unstable API in Debian is
not that uncommon (enlightenment [by now stable], libfso*,
libradare*, ...).  It obviously increases the maintenance work,
though.

-- Sebastian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature