Bug#627500: Bug#627509: Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
On May 29, Lucas Le Dore lucasled...@gmail.com wrote: The problem on 2) is that udevd keeps /run directory busy (managing Good catch. The problem actually is that udevd should not be running anymore at that point, I need to understand better why it is not being killed. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote: Curious thing is that even if the directory does not exist, /proc/mounts displays it as mounted... I would say impossibile, even. Is it ? However, it's the state after bootup with udev-168.2 and initscripts-2.88dsf-13.2, if the /run directory is not present on rootfs. If rootfs does not contain /run, default behavior of initramfs init script is: 1) Move /run/udev and /run/initramfs to /dev/.udev and /dev/.initramfs 2) Umount /run The problem on 2) is that udevd keeps /run directory busy (managing /run/udev/queue.bin, even deleted); it can't be unmounted. After chroot, /proc/mounts still displays /run, which is not present on the rootfs. Note that the latest initscripts does not even let the system boot if the /run directory is not here. Now I have to figure when and what process should normally have created that directory on my system, and why it didn't. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
I've had the same issue! Hope that the following info will help. The installation failed: Setting up udev (170-1) ... mv: cannot move `/dev/.udev/' to `/run/udev/': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports (and so did all the rest of the full-upgrade). Then I found this bug and tested this: thor:~# cat /proc/mounts | grep run tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,size=812300k,mode=755 0 0 thor:~# thor:~# ls -l / totale 127 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 29 mag 11.17 bin drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 3072 29 mag 11.27 boot lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 13 mag 2007 cdrom - media/cdrom drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 3540 29 mag 10.59 dev drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 13 mag 2007 emul drwxr-xr-x 181 root root 12288 29 mag 11.36 etc drwxrwsr-x 7 root staff 4096 28 mag 2010 home drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 13 mag 2007 initrd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 26 mag 20.35 initrd.img - /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-1-amd64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 19 mar 14.10 initrd.img.old - boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-1-amd64 drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 16384 29 mag 11.22 lib drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 12288 12 mag 23.09 lib32 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 15 set 2007 lib64 - /lib drwx-- 2 root root 16384 22 gen 2010 lost+found drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 29 mag 10.59 media drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4096 31 mar 22.07 mnt drwxr-xr-x 6 marco users 4096 27 feb 16.41 opt dr-xr-xr-x 132 root root 0 29 mag 2011 proc drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 28 mag 16.47 root drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 12288 29 mag 11.18 sbin drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 8 mar 2007 selinux drwxr-xr-x 25 marco root 4096 4 mag 23.03 srv drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 0 29 mag 2011 sys drwxrwxrwx 21 root root 4096 29 mag 11.41 tmp drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 1 ott 2010 usr drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 18 lug 2010 var lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 26 mag 20.35 vmlinuz - boot/vmlinuz-2.6.39-1-amd64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 19 mar 14.10 vmlinuz.old - boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-1-amd64 thor:~# Then I did: # mkdir /run and # aptitude full-upgrade again. This time everything went fine, fortunatly! Best regards Marco Menardi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
Sorry for the delay. I don't know on which stage the /run directory should have been created, but I had to do it myself to make things work. Curious thing is that even if the directory does not exist, /proc/mounts displays it as mounted... Thanks, Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
On May 27, Lucas Le Doré lucasled...@gmail.com wrote: Curious thing is that even if the directory does not exist, /proc/mounts displays it as mounted... I would say impossibile, even. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
severity 627500 normal tag 627500 unreproducible moreinfo thanks I am unable to reproduce this bug and the submitter did not provide any useful information, so I am demoting it. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
Package: udev Version: 169-1 Severity: grave aptitude upgrade fail on udev 169-1 configuration: Setting up udev (169-1) ... mv: cannot move `/dev/.udev/' to `/run/udev/': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of fuse-utils: fuse-utils depends on udev | makedev (= 2.3.1-80); however: Package udev is not configured yet. Package makedev is not installed. Dependant and subsequent packages could not be updated. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages udev depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.5.39 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.13-4 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libselinux1 2.0.98-1+b1 SELinux runtime shared libraries ii libudev0 169-1 libudev shared library ii lsb-base 3.2-27 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii util-linux 2.17.2-9.1 Miscellaneous system utilities Versions of packages udev recommends: ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-9 Linux PCI Utilities ii usbutils 1:001-1Linux USB utilities udev suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf changed [not included] -- debconf information: udev/new_kernel_needed: false udev/title/upgrade: udev/reboot_needed: udev/sysfs_deprecated_incompatibility: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
mv: cannot move `/dev/.udev/' to `/run/udev/': No such file or directory I do not understand how this could happen since postinst checks that /run is mounted. How is your system different? if ! chrooted [ -d /dev/.udev/ -a ! -d /run/udev/ ] \ grep -E -q ^[^[:space:]]+ /run tmpfs /proc/mounts; then mv /dev/.udev/ /run/udev/ fi -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#627500: udev 169-1 configuration fail
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 05:00:00PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: mv: cannot move `/dev/.udev/' to `/run/udev/': No such file or directory I do not understand how this could happen since postinst checks that /run is mounted. How is your system different? I don't know, nothing special here. If it helps, trying to install the package a second time succeeded. Now I've got also the /run directory filled with lots of files and directories :). Regards, Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
