Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> >>>  libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils)
> >>
> >> FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed.
> >
> > Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub).
> 
> That's a pair of testsuite failures due to a kernel bug and not a
> regression in elfutils as far as I can tell.
> 
> kfreebsd buildd admins, is it possible to schedule a rebuild with
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck, or would it be better to request that
> directly in debian/rules as a temporary workaround?  (Please forgive
> my ignorance.)
> 
I think this should be worked around in the elfutils package.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

>>>  libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils)
>>
>> FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed.
>
> Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub).

That's a pair of testsuite failures due to a kernel bug and not a
regression in elfutils as far as I can tell.

kfreebsd buildd admins, is it possible to schedule a rebuild with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck, or would it be better to request that
directly in debian/rules as a temporary workaround?  (Please forgive
my ignorance.)

Thanks,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org