Bug#638008: This bug might already be fixed
Hi Marcus and Alessandro, these bugs (java.security.ProviderException: Could not initialize NSS) and (SSL connections fail: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsoftokn3.so does not exist) sounds like #641305, which I reported yesterday against ca-certificates-java, and which Torsten fixed immediately. Can you check if upgrading to ca-certificates-java 20110912 fixes them? Damien, your statement Given your libc6 version, you seems to be running Debian Squeeze (stable). Generally speaking, we don't provide support for mixed installation with experimental with stable packages : it won't work. is not generally true [1] - it should work. Upgrading between Debian stable releases upgrades all software by 2 years, and there are in practice many cases where you cannot do the upgrade in one run. And with providing testing and backports Debian is pushing users into many more situations where they have a mixture of stable and unstable installed. And if a Debian package runs a Java program in the postinst that is usually run in a mixed installation when upgrading from oldstable to stable. cu Adrian [1] It is even less true in this case, where you are using this as an excuse for not debugging a bug that is also present in a pure unstable. -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638008: This bug might already be fixed
Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: these bugs (java.security.ProviderException: Could not initialize NSS) and (SSL connections fail: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsoftokn3.so does not exist) sounds like #641305, which I reported yesterday against ca-certificates-java, and which Torsten fixed immediately. if have fixed the nss workaround in ca-certificates-java which has been there for a while but was broken. But I did not fix the JRE itself. I think the nss.cfg file needs to be updated. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637337: Bug#638008: This bug might already be fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 2011-09-13 12:42, Adrian Bunk wrote: these bugs (java.security.ProviderException: Could not initialize NSS) and (SSL connections fail: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsoftokn3.so does not exist) sounds like #641305, which I reported yesterday against ca-certificates-java, and which Torsten fixed immediately. Can you check if upgrading to ca-certificates-java 20110912 fixes them? It does not fix #638008 (SSL connections fail: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsoftokn3.so does not exist). Still the same exception. Cheers, Marcus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk5vOvcACgkQXjXn6TzcAQnE2QCYmxD7xvTnutYF6Bcb4VlREdB2 MgCcDDrp/ebHE/eipkLGRlSL4SlckS0= =7gTk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638008: This bug might already be fixed
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:18:46PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: these bugs (java.security.ProviderException: Could not initialize NSS) and (SSL connections fail: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsoftokn3.so does not exist) sounds like #641305, which I reported yesterday against ca-certificates-java, and which Torsten fixed immediately. if have fixed the nss workaround in ca-certificates-java which has been there for a while but was broken. But I did not fix the JRE itself. I think the nss.cfg file needs to be updated. Thanks for that information. What would be a non-workaround solution that: - is stable and doesn't break in the future and - works with both stable and unstable and - also finds the correct NSS libraries in multi-arch setups with different arch versions of NSS installed? [1] ? Cheers, Torsten cu Adrian [1] I think your workaround might fail in such situations. -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638008: This bug might already be fixed
Hi Adrian and others, Le mardi 13 septembre 2011 12:42:54, Adrian Bunk a écrit : Hi Marcus and Alessandro, [...] Damien, your statement Given your libc6 version, you seems to be running Debian Squeeze (stable). Generally speaking, we don't provide support for mixed installation with experimental with stable packages : it won't work. is not generally true [1] - it should work. [...] [1] It is even less true in this case, where you are using this as an excuse for not debugging a bug that is also present in a pure unstable. Andrian, please, don't try to make assomption about what I'm doing or not doing. It's annoying and counterproductive : it won't make things fixed faster. In this particular case : I closed this report (#637337) but keep other one, on the same issue but in unstable, open (#638008). So, I have to disagree with you : I don't try to hide problem or searching excuse :/ There is two importants things here : 1/ I don't have time to support / give help to people using *stable* with *experimental* or *unstable* packages. It's nice if it's work but it's not my priority. It's why we have backports after all : provide a repository of tested packages from testing to stable users. Upgrading between Debian stable releases upgrades all software by 2 years, and there are in practice many cases where you cannot do the upgrade in one run. And with providing testing and backports Debian is pushing users into many more situations where they have a mixture of stable and unstable installed. [...] 2/ yes, of course, we support upgrading from stable to stable-next and during this upgrade you'll have a mixed installation. And of course, this issue #638008 is clearly serious for next release and 'll be fixed... Seriously, I don't understand what you are trying to demonstrate here. Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
