Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:17:57 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: bts severity 639466 serious thanks Hello Luca, Luca Capello [2011-10-30 3:26 +0100]: tags 639466 + pending Any chance to do an upload soon? I'll bump the severity of the remaining four 8.4 bugs to RC now, and request removal of 8.4. Ping. This is the last reverse dep of pg 8.4 now. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
Hi there! On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:45:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:17:57 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: Luca Capello [2011-10-30 3:26 +0100]: tags 639466 + pending Any chance to do an upload soon? I'll bump the severity of the remaining four 8.4 bugs to RC now, and request removal of 8.4. Ping. This is the last reverse dep of pg 8.4 now. We are working to including all the pending changes in Bacula before the freeze, with the intent to finally upload a new package this week-end (or at the very beginning of the next week). However, given that the new version adds new -dbg binary packages, it should pass NEW. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpnQXq7jH4MD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
bts severity 639466 serious thanks Hello Luca, Luca Capello [2011-10-30 3:26 +0100]: tags 639466 + pending Any chance to do an upload soon? I'll bump the severity of the remaining four 8.4 bugs to RC now, and request removal of 8.4. Thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
tags 639466 + pending thanks Hi there! On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:02:29 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: Luca Capello [2011-10-26 19:26 +0200]: Even if I tested it and it works without, can you confirm that using postgresql-server-dev-all means that I can also remove 'libpq-dev (= 8.4)' from the Build-Depends:? You can, as -server-dev-X.Y pulls it in. If bacula actually uses libpq somewhere, it's cleaner to explicitly build-depend on it, though. /usr/bin/bscan (bacula-sd-pgsql) and /usr/sbin/[bacula-dir|btape|dbcheck] (bacula-director-pgsql) use libpq, so I left it. Thank you for the suggestion, it is in my local copy. Awesome, thank you! Committed: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=9e5f75495f791a1846c4c9932d3420f9134c72a4 Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpUuaDtHki1g.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
tags 639466 + pending thanks Hi Martin! On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:23:38 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: Please rebuild this package against postgresql-server-dev-9.1 instead of -8.4, or consider just using postgresql-server-dev-all. Even if I tested it and it works without, can you confirm that using postgresql-server-dev-all means that I can also remove 'libpq-dev (= 8.4)' from the Build-Depends:? While you are at it, please also clean up the dependencies to use the metapackages: Thank you for the suggestion, it is in my local copy. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpjNZZ9GDYw1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#639466: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#639466: bacula: Please move to postgresql-9.1
Hello Luca, Luca Capello [2011-10-26 19:26 +0200]: Even if I tested it and it works without, can you confirm that using postgresql-server-dev-all means that I can also remove 'libpq-dev (= 8.4)' from the Build-Depends:? You can, as -server-dev-X.Y pulls it in. If bacula actually uses libpq somewhere, it's cleaner to explicitly build-depend on it, though. Thank you for the suggestion, it is in my local copy. Awesome, thank you! Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
