Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:27:53PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/29 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related.
This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fixed in kfreebsd-8
by 107_mount_update.diff. This patch has been disabled in kfreebsd-9
(probably because this part has been changed upstream), so this is where
to look first.
Uhm... ISTR it's me who removed that patch during the upgrade. In any
case, I re-checked, and it seems to me that the code that made iovec
arguments a requirement is no longer present.
Err, I don't see any iovec arguments in the 107_mount_update.diff
that google finds for me as [Glibc-bsd-commits] r3165.
I don't have time to look deeper right now though :-(
Until we are sure it's not a kfreebsd-9 bug, it's better to keep the bug
assigned to kfreebsd-9.
Since stock freebsd is documented as requiring -u (update) when
changing the mount options of an already-mounted filesystem, it
seems very likely to be a kfreebsd bug.
Requiring -u is a requirement from the userland mount utility. Here we
are talking about the kernel interface. In this case the MNT_UPDATE flag
passed to the nmount() function is ignored if the filesystem was mounted
ro and the update is to mount it rw.
Well, shame on me for not reading the kernel code before posting.
Though, a quick glance at vfs_donmount and vfs_domount{,_update} do not
make things terribly clear how this works. I'm not up for grubbing
through vfs_getopt today, though, so I'll leave it be.
-Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
reassign 646957 kfreebsd-9 thanks On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 07:56:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Package: busybox Version: 1:1.17.1-8 Severity: normal Tags: d-i User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd When running on kFreeBSD 9.0, mount -o remount,rw no longer remounts the target file system in writable mode. Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related. This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fixed in kfreebsd-8 by 107_mount_update.diff. This patch has been disabled in kfreebsd-9 (probably because this part has been changed upstream), so this is where to look first. Until we are sure it's not a kfreebsd-9 bug, it's better to keep the bug assigned to kfreebsd-9. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
2011/10/29 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net: Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related. This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fixed in kfreebsd-8 by 107_mount_update.diff. This patch has been disabled in kfreebsd-9 (probably because this part has been changed upstream), so this is where to look first. Uhm... ISTR it's me who removed that patch during the upgrade. In any case, I re-checked, and it seems to me that the code that made iovec arguments a requirement is no longer present. I don't have time to look deeper right now though :-( Until we are sure it's not a kfreebsd-9 bug, it's better to keep the bug assigned to kfreebsd-9. Ok. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/29 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net: Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related. This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fixed in kfreebsd-8 by 107_mount_update.diff. This patch has been disabled in kfreebsd-9 (probably because this part has been changed upstream), so this is where to look first. Uhm... ISTR it's me who removed that patch during the upgrade. In any case, I re-checked, and it seems to me that the code that made iovec arguments a requirement is no longer present. Err, I don't see any iovec arguments in the 107_mount_update.diff that google finds for me as [Glibc-bsd-commits] r3165. I don't have time to look deeper right now though :-( Until we are sure it's not a kfreebsd-9 bug, it's better to keep the bug assigned to kfreebsd-9. Since stock freebsd is documented as requiring -u (update) when changing the mount options of an already-mounted filesystem, it seems very likely to be a kfreebsd bug. -Ben Kaduk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:27:53PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/29 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net: Which seems to be kfreebsd-9 related, not busybox related. This is very likely to be the same bug than the one fixed in kfreebsd-8 by 107_mount_update.diff. This patch has been disabled in kfreebsd-9 (probably because this part has been changed upstream), so this is where to look first. Uhm... ISTR it's me who removed that patch during the upgrade. In any case, I re-checked, and it seems to me that the code that made iovec arguments a requirement is no longer present. Err, I don't see any iovec arguments in the 107_mount_update.diff that google finds for me as [Glibc-bsd-commits] r3165. I don't have time to look deeper right now though :-( Until we are sure it's not a kfreebsd-9 bug, it's better to keep the bug assigned to kfreebsd-9. Since stock freebsd is documented as requiring -u (update) when changing the mount options of an already-mounted filesystem, it seems very likely to be a kfreebsd bug. Requiring -u is a requirement from the userland mount utility. Here we are talking about the kernel interface. In this case the MNT_UPDATE flag passed to the nmount() function is ignored if the filesystem was mounted ro and the update is to mount it rw. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
Package: busybox Version: 1:1.17.1-8 Severity: normal Tags: d-i User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd When running on kFreeBSD 9.0, mount -o remount,rw no longer remounts the target file system in writable mode. This will break D-I in the future when kfreebsd-kernel-di-* is upgraded to 9.x. To reproduce: $ sudo mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 32m md0 $ sudo mkfs.ufs /dev/md0 /dev/md0: 32.0MB (65536 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 [...] $ sudo busybox mount -o ro -t ufs /dev/md0 /mnt $ mount | grep /mnt /dev/md0 on /mnt (ufs, local, read-only) $ sudo busybox mount -o remount,rw -t ufs /dev/md0 /mnt $ mount | grep /mnt /dev/md0 on /mnt (ufs, local, read-only) -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages busybox depends on: ii libc0.1 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib busybox recommends no packages. busybox suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
On 28.10.2011 21:56, Robert Millan wrote: Package: busybox Version: 1:1.17.1-8 Severity: normal Tags: d-i User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd When running on kFreeBSD 9.0, mount -o remount,rw no longer remounts the target file system in writable mode. This will break D-I in the future when kfreebsd-kernel-di-* is upgraded to 9.x. Can you please check with 1.19 busybox package? Also, where one can get 9.0 kFreeBSD to reproduce? Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
Hi Michael, 2011/10/28 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: Can you please check with 1.19 busybox package? Unfortunately 1.19 is FTBFS [1]. I haven't got around to fixing that yet, sorry! :-( [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=busyboxarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1%3A1.19.2-3stamp=1319822296 Also, where one can get 9.0 kFreeBSD to reproduce? It's available in experimental: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=kfreebsd-image-9.0 -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#646957: mount -o remount,rw has no effect with kFreeBSD 9.0
On 29.10.2011 00:05, Robert Millan wrote: Hi Michael, 2011/10/28 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: Can you please check with 1.19 busybox package? Unfortunately 1.19 is FTBFS [1]. I haven't got around to fixing that yet, sorry! :-( [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=busyboxarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1%3A1.19.2-3stamp=1319822296 Sigh. I especially uploaded a new version today in order to fix FTBFS bug. And I verified it builds on kfreebsd, -- I installed it for this very case in a KVM virtual machine. This one is simple, I'll take care of it, but I've no idea for now how it built here. Also, where one can get 9.0 kFreeBSD to reproduce? It's available in experimental: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=kfreebsd-image-9.0 Ah ok, I'll take a look. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
