Bug#659907: texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade
Coin, I had to remove jadetex to continue upgrading my machine, and it was in fact purged. After reinstalling the problem still arise. On another machine having texlive-full and jadetex too i could not reproduce. I'm still trying to find a real different besides the architecture (i386 in this case). Quoting Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de: I guess you can reproduce the problem by running fmtutil-sys --byfmt jadetex as root, right? Yes. I see a lot of sty files from hyperref in /usr/local/share/texmf, which are read by initex when generating the format file for jadetex. Could you (temporarily) hide them by renaming the texmf tree and rerun mktexlsr? You were right, my local extensions were at fault (and not present on the other machine). The message was not that clear, and honestly i would not have expected difficulties when upgrading to a new Debian revision. As this bug will not appear on a pure Debian installation you may well close this bug. Nevertheless avoiding such breakage when there is no new upstream release would be much better if possible. Tell me if you want to investigate more on the subject. Regards. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpWRomvN5mJe.pgp Description: PGP Digital Signature
Bug#612924: Bug#659907: texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
On 20.02.12 Rogério Brito (rbr...@ime.usp.br) wrote: Hi, Package: texlive-binaries Followup-For: Bug #659907 Hi there. I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause. This is probably #612924. For #659907 we still don't know the root cause, b/c the submitter did not respond yet. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659907: texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed
Package: texlive-binaries
Followup-For: Bug #659907
Hi there.
I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if
the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause.
I don't have jadetex installed.
For some reason, reverting back to stable's version of texlive-base (*not*
texlive-binaries) reinstalls the conffile pdftexconfig.tex which is what was
trying to be found during the upgrade (below are last lines of the fmtutil log):
,
| fmtutil: running `pdftex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex
-translate-file=cp227.tcx *latex.ini' ...
| This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) (INITEX)
| (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/web2c/cp227.tcx)
| entering extended mode
| (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/latexconfig/latex.ini
| ! I can't find file `pdftexconfig'.
| l.7 \input pdftexconfig
|
| (Press Enter to retry, or Control-D to exit)
| Please type another input file name:
| ! Emergency stop.
| l.7 \input pdftexconfig
|
| No pages of output.
| Transcript written on latex.log.
`
Upon reinstallation of texlive-base from stable, I get this:
,
| Selecting previously unselected package libpoppler5.
| (Reading database ... 225518 files and directories currently installed.)
| Unpacking libpoppler5 (from .../libpoppler5_0.12.4-1.2_i386.deb) ...
| dpkg: warning: downgrading texlive-base from 2009-15 to 2009-11.
| Preparing to replace texlive-base 2009-15 (using
.../texlive-base_2009-11_all.deb) ...
| Reinstalling deleted mandatory conffile pdftexconfig.tex
| Unpacking replacement texlive-base ...
| dpkg: warning: downgrading texlive-binaries from 2009-12 to 2009-8.
| Preparing to replace texlive-binaries 2009-12 (using
.../texlive-binaries_2009-8_i386.deb) ...
| Unpacking replacement texlive-binaries ...
`
Please note the line Reinstalling deleted mandatory conffile
pdftexconfig.tex.
If there is any further information that may be needed, just let me know.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
ii ed 1.6-1
ii libc6 2.13-26
ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3.1
ii libfreetype62.4.8-1
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.2-15
ii libkpathsea52009-12
ii libncurses5 5.9-4
ii libpng12-0 1.2.47-1
ii libpoppler5 0.12.4-1.2
ii libstdc++6 4.6.2-15
ii libx11-62:1.4.4-4
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.9-3
ii libxmu6 2:1.1.0-3
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.9-4
ii libxt6 1:1.1.1-2
ii perl5.14.2-7
ii tex-common 2.10
ii texlive-common 2009-15
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.6.dfsg-1
texlive-binaries recommends no packages.
texlive-binaries suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659907: texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade
retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed thanks On 2012-02-14 19:47:16 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: The log is attached. Maybe this is a bug in jadetex, but as it worked before, it may as well be a regression in your latest upload, so i'm reporting to the one triggering it. For the record i already had jadetex 3.13-12 installed before this upgrade. FYI, without jadetex installed, the upgrade is OK. Now, I don't know where the bug is. -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659907: texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade
On 15.02.12 Vincent Lefevre (vinc...@vinc17.net) wrote: retitle 659907 texlive-binaries: fails to upgrade with jadetex installed thanks On 2012-02-14 19:47:16 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: Hi Marc, The log is attached. Maybe this is a bug in jadetex, but as it worked before, it may as well be a regression in your latest upload, so i'm reporting to the one triggering it. For the record i already had jadetex 3.13-12 installed before this upgrade. FYI, without jadetex installed, the upgrade is OK. Now, I don't know where the bug is. I guess you can reproduce the problem by running fmtutil-sys --byfmt jadetex as root, right? I see a lot of sty files from hyperref in /usr/local/share/texmf, which are read by initex when generating the format file for jadetex. Could you (temporarily) hide them by renaming the texmf tree and rerun mktexlsr? H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
