Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
If I do that, I get a complaint that one of the other listed package is not going to be installed. I tried specifying all of them on one command line and I got a complaint that libpixman-1.dev was not going to be installed. Adding that made the complaints go circular. Can you please post the complete output of this command so that one of us can take a look at it and advise on what to do next? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, peter green wrote: If I do that, I get a complaint that one of the other listed package is not going to be installed. I tried specifying all of them on one command line and I got a complaint that libpixman-1.dev was not going to be installed. Adding that made the complaints go circular. Can you please post the complete output of this command so that one of us can take a look at it and advise on what to do next? $ sudo apt-get install fp-units-gtk fpc libcairo2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev fp-units-gnome1 libpixman-1-dev libpixman-1-0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done libpixman-1-0 is already the newest version. libpixman-1-0 set to manually installed. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcairo2-dev : Depends: libpixman-1-dev (= 0.18.4) but 0.16.4-1 is to be installed libpixman-1-dev : Depends: libpixman-1-0 (= 0.16.4-1) but 0.24.0-1~bpo60+1 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- David Griffith d...@661.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? Cheers, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? I'm using Squeeze with the following extra repositories: deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main deb-src http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports iceweasel-release deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main non-free deb-src http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main non-free I'm not sure I understand what you mean by dependencies that are missing. I thought I explained that. These: 1) fp-units-gnome1 [Not Installed] 2) fp-units-gtk [Not Installed] 3) fpc [Not Installed] 4) libcairo2-dev [Not Installed] 5) libgtk2.0-dev [Not Installed] 6) libpango1.0-dev [Not Installed] -- David Griffith d...@661.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 21:10, David Griffith d...@661.org wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by dependencies that are missing. I thought I explained that. These: 1) fp-units-gnome1 [Not Installed] What happens when you try to install one of these packages directly? eg., 'apt-get install fp-units-gnome1'? 2) fp-units-gtk [Not Installed] 3) fpc [Not Installed] 4) libcairo2-dev [Not Installed] 5) libgtk2.0-dev [Not Installed] 6) libpango1.0-dev [Not Installed] -- Carlos Laviola Debian GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Carlos Laviola wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 21:10, David Griffith d...@661.org wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by dependencies that are missing. I thought I explained that. These: 1) fp-units-gnome1 [Not Installed] What happens when you try to install one of these packages directly? eg., 'apt-get install fp-units-gnome1'? 2) fp-units-gtk [Not Installed] 3) fpc [Not Installed] 4) libcairo2-dev [Not Installed] 5) libgtk2.0-dev [Not Installed] 6) libpango1.0-dev [Not Installed] If I do that, I get a complaint that one of the other listed package is not going to be installed. I tried specifying all of them on one command line and I got a complaint that libpixman-1.dev was not going to be installed. Adding that made the complaints go circular. -- David Griffith d...@661.org
Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed
Package: fpc Version: 2.4.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to install fpc through aptitude or apt-get fails because of the following packages that will not be installed: fp-units-gnome1 fp-units-gtk libcairo2-dev libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev Aptitude simply says Some packages were broken and have been fixed and goes on to say Keep the following packages at their current version (Not Installed) and then the packages are listed. Apt-get complains like this: ===begin quote=== $ sudo apt-get install fpc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: fpc : Depends: fp-units-gtk but it is not going to be installed Depends: fp-units-gnome1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages $ ===end quote=== -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.4 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
