Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (fix policy violation)
Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru writes: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:04AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 The conflict is resolved by renaming ts to tsp. The packaging looks OK now (at least I didn't find any problems). You should probably choose priority optional rather than extra. Did you have a chance to discuss those cppcheck warnings with upstream? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (fix policy violation)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:44:55PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru writes: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:04AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 The conflict is resolved by renaming ts to tsp. The packaging looks OK now (at least I didn't find any problems). You should probably choose priority optional rather than extra. Ok. Did you have a chance to discuss those cppcheck warnings with upstream? Unfortunately, I could not find your mail about cppcheck, so I ran cppcheck by myself. I think these warnings are fixable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (fix policy violation)
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:04AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. ( http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries ) In particular your package ships /usr/bin/ts, which is also present in moreutils. Note that conflicts are not appropriate to resolve this problem; it is perfectly plausible for people to want both moreutils and task-spooler installed. Since your package is the new one, the obvious thing is for you to rename your version. I leave that to you and Joey Hess (the moreutils maintainer) to sort out. The conflict is resolved by renaming ts to tsp. I have reuploaded new task-spooler 0.7.3-1 to http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
