Bug#662379: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#662379: Bug#662379: insighttoolkit: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev

2012-03-11 Thread Luis Ibanez
Steve,

We could look into updating the ITK dependency on
PNG to use 1.5, once we resume the maintenance
cycle of ITK in a couple of weeks.

I'm not sure if that is too late for the current packaging
that you are working on...

Luis


--
2012/3/4 Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca:
 block 662379 by 648136
 thanks

 On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:06:44PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:

 Libpng maintainers plan transition of libpng[0].
 Version 1.2 is used for libpng of current debian, but will shifts
 to version 1.5 in this transition.
 Your package still does it depending on libpng12-dev.

 Yes, and insighttoolkit cannot change because PNG 1.5
 breaks the API; see 648126.

 Either libpng 1.5 needs to be made API compatible or a suitable
 modification needs to be made to insighttoolkit upstream.

 Regards,
 -Steve

 ___
 Debian-med-packaging mailing list
 debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#662379: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#662379: Bug#662379: insighttoolkit: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev

2012-03-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi Luis,

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:33:52PM -0400, Luis Ibanez wrote:

 We could look into updating the ITK dependency on
 PNG to use 1.5, once we resume the maintenance
 cycle of ITK in a couple of weeks.
 
 I'm not sure if that is too late for the current packaging
 that you are working on...

Any help you can provide is welcome.  I'm kind of hoping that there is
a minor change that either (a) I can back-port to Debian's 4.1.0
package, or (b) you guys can release as 4.1.1.

I don't know libpng at all and I haven't investigated the issue.
Nobuhiro: is there a guide or FAQ for porting code to 1.5?

Cheers,
-Steve


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature