Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Am So den 25. Mär 2012 um 1:53 schrieb Norbert Preining: reassign 665458 jadetex severity 665458 important retitle 665458 missing dep on texlive-generic-recommended (for ulem.sty) thanks On Sa, 24 Mär 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote: As I mention on the bug before there is another grave bug holding the What is grave? Grave is not installable. So this bug is a grave bug, fullstop! Read the description in reportbug: 2 grave makes the package in question unusable by most or all users, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. uninstallable means unusable in my eyes. important is the wrong severity. However, I will not fight a retagging fight. This is childish and do not help the bug to get fixed. If you want to spoil the debian policy, go ahead. ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found. Reading the error you can see an easy way to fix it, search for ulem.sty in the package repository and install the resp package: apt-get install texlive-generic-recommended reassigning, adjusting, retitling bug. Package texlive-generic-recommended was installed. Regards Klaus -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJPbtwNAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasaK4MAMI84yXfCpOqu+bYRLLg2OeZ yt7m9niTZ6/cIF603v+cqV7mfAIWSKnEVSi6kV7DUdyqL5TfUs9KEuudac/w9+hi Sb9Kum2OX0tPzpdcOiBaHG5TVmvTxVZdmtYnPkEt+h2b/ZseWnNy72aotsBMp/aW 5q2hRzwtVu4ZCj5bVPkHdXLkZRHAqtArQ2qPDMrRuA+qYhJlBhZLQ+0+8k2JzAiq mwmZq/DYuJZdXR8fANoujM2LOFXttZ2NzDXg27LErLkrsRJDQ8ZwLSa3zCMtQTw1 jGf7mlF0Xk27eRH0k82cGqsf1tMAStsVygaBq8fPvkk/+Er5ER1gjY/jwlbvJHHU +1jW9U/QN8aWDphefV8tokbETJ63NcPMNkEIovvheSJRe5Eb/nrUhwZkNcL8BoHS jJWCfUqTry3TtcQBU15zp6VcNV07Zgv/XlV5pBbB9gKJa4I290U1NblPEm9LFFFf Qkz4uAmcmsJEB73aiNj9tmgNvdUYFi/G54pEccFOpw== =EqAz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
tags 665458 + unreproducible
thanks
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Grave is not installable. So this bug is a grave bug, fullstop! Read the
description in reportbug:
2 grave makes the package in question unusable by most or all
users, or causes data loss, or
introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts
of users who use the package.
* unusable: you reported against tex-common, and the building of a format
jadetex was brokeen. Uninstalling jadetex would have fixed it.
Thus *not* unusalbe *by*most*or*all*users.
* dataloss: no
* security hole: no
Discussion about severity finished. fullstop.
uninstallable means unusable in my eyes. important is the wrong
YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot
reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot
with only those packages I mentioned installed ...
! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found.
Package texlive-generic-recommended was installed.
That is interesting ... if it was installed, then before running
the triggers of tex-common, mktexlsr is run. So it should find
ulem.sty, because it *is* in texlive-generic-recommended.
Can you reproduce this behaviour? Is it still happening?
I.e., does
dpkg --configure -a
break down? If yes, can you tell me the output of
kpsewhich ulem.sty
kpsewhich texmf.cnf
and what files you are havin gin /etc/texmf?
Thanks
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
MAENTWROG (n. Welsh)
The height by which the top of a wave exceeds the heigh to which you
have rolled up your trousers.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Am So den 25. Mär 2012 um 9:54 schrieb Norbert Preining: Discussion about severity finished. fullstop. As I told, play your childish severity game alone. uninstallable means unusable in my eyes. important is the wrong YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot with only those packages I mentioned installed ... Yes. The bug happens with tex-common. If it is jadetex, feel free to reassign the bug to that package. It is easy to do so. ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found. Package texlive-generic-recommended was installed. That is interesting ... if it was installed, then before running the triggers of tex-common, mktexlsr is run. So it should find ulem.sty, because it *is* in texlive-generic-recommended. Well, I did search for this file and it was not in the package. But at the moment I start a new try. The files are downloading. Can you reproduce this behaviour? I was able, yes. At the moment I download the packages. Will take around 15 Minutes. Gruà Klaus -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJPbt8aAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasYzEL/RDjEyD/DTh0WcE/JZuxDJW1 dSzuiLH76IoMIrA5Wfex2vNxlteLuRprVGKXu7AfkiIp6uSxJ8lycGCbkGOcfPNF 4I8dkn94C3ULwtkTlRTNK1z/IQfTQQYq0CgCPsMqcm18wimdg/XUhw9+Qo103XtR U3uhly1D6NX57NV2O9VZFFCapNoJPqu/jxaLlqkmsaTDKJ8Vg5zEPecWsP6wPLAz gzxQwrzNDDKBYiqbhZqj2+ajWQ+5E+jsqRyunZ3thmT8coKNz1u8+zT7+W3UJYeG RdAaEjbdVDh+cQBGnW4wzgw4EDPDIxTHOd5ZGeMYg9DIhLFL87B8sEAqKuQtM/rf YU6v3liOFIHH0dqHb6QbQALSw3knYePNOaTnyDYlpc9aVbRmOZTuqbeQS4S/L/z7 ajs4bZwpwksWVn+dn/crBXa6r0aL3a6FHi5+vf/WoZP1yGr3EBn8OYQ1YESdH902 ezJ6RmzMCML5E2Dc8qNkhk5zOwjHGo8NLe5UghBOIg== =s+qL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot
reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot
with only those packages I mentioned installed ...
Yes. The bug happens with tex-common. If it is jadetex, feel free to
reassign the bug to that package. It is easy to do so.
Already done in the first email, and retitled, and closed in the
new upload of jadetex, all done last night.
ulem.sty, because it *is* in texlive-generic-recommended.
Well, I did search for this file and it was not in the package. But at
the moment I start a new try. The files are downloading.
Well, that could be a consequence of the missing dependency, that
jadetex is tried to be configured *before* texlive-generic-recommended
is updated. But that would be strange, since tex-common breaks against
all these, so it should be already unpacked.
Can you reproduce this behaviour?
I was able, yes. At the moment I download the packages. Will take around
15 Minutes.
Let me know if you can reproduce it with the latest jadetex, thanks.
And send me in the broken state the information I asked.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BILBSTER
A pimple so hideous and enormous that you have to cover it with
sticking plaster and pretend you've cut yourself shaving.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi, everything is fine now with jadetex (3.13-14) and tex-common (3.5). Thanks. Regards Klaus -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJPbuMLAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfaskj4MAIo8JY+gilEgsChr+m1s9zNx P+bgEC/uNzfVESH3qVz3sk7sYtLbWJDUPpG5uoc4AnRDfLcK1x2ie9EkpsOpV/sN z46DRP1jxp/FDynZ/SNKx5c2z54pgys1VZUFD3Q7zHQoBJSJPBuzfmD4jFHd+Ryc /OOsbeY9AXQsKI8EFpGsAzASWAw8nKL55RusqXV1zqHUIcO73eCnEyTjNiS4vgGR XaPFSuqEogt9dIl4hffZbIGnofXlKBXaL3bHikIMXORkgDzN+DjYUzgkkEaSeZAc 0jtqlW1axdVd3cvDdj3jlMGurAo7VqhTtwRC4jWSKLWQJotz0sHSir2pEnVSeRwe DDOdU7x/JH3jHxEkB0F2s4QePrZqoOOMUWkG5q96lbOeNjL03YGnkqDGF0luyECj qXX2LXnn2w6KF2QGDX4+eO9qVhyoX1gX8tbgzqkrIws8vJiXD2NCmDRzW2mTWEF3 UyQzUI8TOW0ofqoy1hYC9y+mp2zfs6zgS7Lu1oiXyg== =iQva -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
everything is fine now with jadetex (3.13-14) and tex-common (3.5).
Good, thanks.
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
Ford had his own code of ethics. It wasn't much of one,
but it was his and he stuck by it, more or less. One rule
he made was never to buy his own drinks. He wasn't sure if
that counted as an ethic, but you have to go with what
you've got.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
reassign 665458 jadetex
severity 665458 important
retitle 665458 missing dep on texlive-generic-recommended (for ulem.sty)
thanks
On Sa, 24 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
As I mention on the bug before there is another grave bug holding the
What is grave?
! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found.
Reading the error you can see an easy way to fix it, search for
ulem.sty in the package repository and install the resp package:
apt-get install texlive-generic-recommended
reassigning, adjusting, retitling bug.
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
SLIGO (n.)
An unnamed and exotic sexual act which people like to believe that
famous films stars get up to in private. 'To commit sligo.'
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found.
Reading the error you can see an easy way to fix it, search for
ulem.sty in the package repository and install the resp package:
apt-get install texlive-generic-recommended
Fixed in jadetex 3.13-14, already uploaded
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
FORSINAIN (n. archaic)
The right of the lord of the manor to molest dwarves on their
birthdays.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
