Bug#670800: [NMU] latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: Helping to update to Copyright format 1.0
I'm planning to NMU with changes listed in previous mail's patch to help migrate away from deprecated dpatch. Please let me know if an update is alredy being worked on, or if the previous patch needs adjustments, or if there is anything that should delay the NMU. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670800: [NMU] latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: Helping to update to Copyright format 1.0
Hi Jari, On Do, 10 Mai 2012, Jari Aalto wrote: I'm planning to NMU with changes listed in previous mail's patch to help migrate away from deprecated dpatch. Although I appreciate your work on that, what on *earth* are you planning? Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE read the developers reference, 5.11.1. When and how to do an NMU There is clearly stated: Does your NMU really fix bugs? Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging style in NMUs is discouraged. All the changes you propose are cosmetic and nothing else. May I dissect your great patch and esp. changelog: + * Update to debhelper to 9. + * debian/compat +- Update to 9. Ok, change 7 - 9, well + * debian/copyright +- Migrate to Copyright Format 1.0. cosmetic. and maintainers *might* prefer *not* to use that format. + * debian/patches: +- Add DEP-3 headers. +- Change to standard *.patch suffix and (-) in file names. renaming and eliminating of white space? + * debian/rules: +- Replace deprecated dh_prep and use dh_prep. first dh_clean - dh_prep, secondly the command was not called: -# dh_clean -k +# dh_prep Please let me know if an update is alredy being worked on, or if the previous patch needs adjustments, or if there is anything that should delay the NMU. Thanks for your work, and Danai *might* include your copyright change in one of the future versions, but this is *SOLELY* up to him as main maintainer of the package. Bottom line: I *STRONGLY* oppose this NMU, there is NO reason to do it. Unrelated question: What is the reason to do that? Do you want to see your name in the copyright file??? Best wishes Norbert Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org} JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 DIDCOT (n.) The tiny oddly-shaped bit of card which a ticket inspector cuts out of a ticket with his clipper for no apparent reason. It is a little-known fact that the confetti at Princess Margaret's wedding was made up of thousands of didcots collected by inspectors on the Royal Train. DIDLING (participial vb.) The process of trying to work out who did it when reading a whodunnit, and trying to keep your options open so that when you find out you can allow yourself to think that you knew perfectly well who it was all along. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670800: [NMU] latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: Helping to update to Copyright format 1.0
On 2012-05-11 07:43, Norbert Preining wrote: | | All the changes you propose are cosmetic and nothing else. There is a motivation to help moving to the newer packaging format: - The E: error reported by Lintian for the use of deprecated dpatch - Simplicity of patching system (reducing depends, standards quilt interface etc.) | Thanks for your work, and Danai *might* include your copyright | change in one of the future versions, but this is *SOLELY* up to | him as main maintainer of the package. I did not notice that latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab had had recent uploads. The information I had written down previously was that the package's last upload was from 2009; based on this, the message about intent to NMU was sent. It's good to see that the package is back in maintenance. The background is that the original developer of dpatch let go the package and it was orphaned long time during 2009...2011 having no maintainer at all. It was understandable: not sensible to mantain parallel project to quilt(). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562697. Dpatch is currently being overseen only due to historical reasons and the current maintainer wishes packages to migrate away from it; hence the Lintian (E:) error for packages that are still using it. I hope that you consider new formats; The benefit of e.g. Copyright Format 1.0 is to help machine processing and License auditing work. Thank you for the comments against the patch. I'm happy to revise it for later package versions if needed. Jari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670800: [NMU] latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: Helping to update to Copyright format 1.0
Hi Jari, On Fr, 11 Mai 2012, jaalto wrote: - The E: error reported by Lintian for the use of deprecated dpatch Wrong, this was fixed in 0.20050817-16 by moving to quilt. - Simplicity of patching system (reducing depends, standards quilt interface etc.) | Thanks for your work, and Danai *might* include your copyright | change in one of the future versions, but this is *SOLELY* up to | him as main maintainer of the package. I did not notice that latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab had had recent uploads. The information I had written down previously was that the package's last upload was from 2009; based on this, the message about Wrong. Why are you telling these wrong things Can you PLEASE look at your own patch as submitted? It is based on version 0.20050817-16 and thus is lintian clean. 0.20050817-16 was uploaded on 24 Mar 2012 you submitted on 29 Apr 2012!!! Your patch was an NMU 0.20050817-16.1 Let us look at the patch *AS*SENT*BY*YOU*: From 1a1623d1e9202e5688eed9625ea44d19f925345f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:28:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] format-1.0 Organization: Private Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net --- debian/changelog | 16 debian/compat |2 +- debian/control |2 +- debian/copyright | 98 +--- .../{01_fix_wftodm.dpatch = 01-fix-wftodm.patch} | 21 ++--- ..._makefont.dpatch = 02-automate-makefont.patch} |5 +- ...te_fixwada.dpatch = 03-automate-fixwada.patch} |5 +- debian/patches/series |6 +- debian/rules |2 +- 9 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) rename debian/patches/{01_fix_wftodm.dpatch = 01-fix-wftodm.patch} (66%) mode change 100755 = 100644 rename debian/patches/{02_automate_makefont.dpatch = 02-automate-makefont.patch} (87%) rename debian/patches/{03_automate_fixwada.dpatch = 03-automate-fixwada.patch} (80%) simple renames diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 16c6d4b..f6dab43 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab (0.20050817-16.1) unstable; urgency=low ### against -16 which already uses quilt + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update to debhelper to 9. + * debian/compat +- Update to 9. + * debian/copyright +- Migrate to Copyright Format 1.0. + * debian/patches: +- Add DEP-3 headers. +- Change to standard *.patch suffix and (-) in file names. + * debian/rules: +- Replace deprecated dh_prep and use dh_prep. + + -- Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:24:44 +0300 + latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab (0.20050817-16) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: add Danai and myself to uploaders diff --git a/debian/compat b/debian/compat index 7f8f011..ec63514 100644 --- a/debian/compat +++ b/debian/compat @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 126fe64..0e4de14 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: tex Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org Uploaders: Danai SAE-HAN (ééè) da...@debian.org, Norbert Preining prein...@debian.org -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.1.0~), tex-common (= 3) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9), tex-common (= 3) Build-Depends-Indep: t1utils, texlive-font-utils, perl-base (= 5.8.0) Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-tex/latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab/trunk diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index 8645195..782d7a6 100644 --- a/debian/copyright +++ b/debian/copyright @@ -1,40 +1,70 @@ # diff --git a/debian/patches/01_fix_wftodm.dpatch b/debian/patches/01-fix-wftodm.patch old mode 100755 new mode 100644 similarity index 66% rename from debian/patches/01_fix_wftodm.dpatch rename to debian/patches/01-fix-wftodm.patch # rename index 39adc0d..371 --- a/debian/patches/01_fix_wftodm.dpatch +++ b/debian/patches/01-fix-wftodm.patch @@ -1,19 +1,10 @@ -01_fix_wftodm.dpatch by danai.sae-...@edpnet.be +From: Werner Lemberg (author of the CJK macro for LaTeX) +Subject: enable partial font downloading + - It also contains a fix to set just one directory as argument instead +of two, without exiting with a 0300 code. + - And last but not least it fixes a segfault on Debian AMD64: +it needs time.h instead of sys/time.h. -This fix is from Werner Lemberg (author of the CJK macro for LaTeX). -It modifies wftodm to enable partial font downloading. -It also contains a fix to set just one directory as argument instead -of two, without exiting with a 0300 code.
Bug#670800: [NMU] latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: Helping to update to Copyright format 1.0
Hi Jari It is already updated in the SVN repository. This bug will therefore be closed with a next upload, but I do not know yet when exactly that will happen. Thank you for your support! Cheers -- Danai On 11 May 2012 00:53, Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote: I'm planning to NMU with changes listed in previous mail's patch to help migrate away from deprecated dpatch. Please let me know if an update is alredy being worked on, or if the previous patch needs adjustments, or if there is anything that should delay the NMU. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tex-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vh07zb1@test20.cante.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org