Bug#672391: Please consider chaging dependency of libsigc++1.2 to 2.0

2013-05-26 Thread Barry deFreese
I have a patch to pick up libsigc++-2.0.  That is the EASY part.

However, 2.0 is not even close to being binary compatible with libsigc++-1.2.

I will try it for a bit but I am not very familiar with libsigc at all.

Thanks,

Barry deFreese
Debian Games Team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#672391: Please consider chaging dependency of libsigc++1.2 to 2.0

2012-05-27 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Hello,

 I would like to ask you to consider changing the build-depends from
 libsigc++-1.2-dev to libsigc++-2.0-dev.
 

Can you please provide a patch?

Simply changing the build dependency results in FTBFS.
Changes are needed to configure.in
They should be fairly minimal, I got a few warnings/errors from autoconf
so regenerating autofoo would be nice.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitrijs.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#672391: Please consider chaging dependency of libsigc++1.2 to 2.0

2012-05-10 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Source: asc
Version: 2.4.0.0-2
Severity: normal

Hello,

I would like to ask you to consider changing the build-depends from
libsigc++-1.2-dev to libsigc++-2.0-dev.

The version in 1.2 is very old, unsupported (last release on 2005,
more than 7 years ago) and it should probably be removed from Debian
when possible.

There are only 3 packages in the whole archive depending on it (versus
150+ for 2.0), and this is one of them.

Regards.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org