Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-07-25 Thread Touko Korpela
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  Source: linux
  Version: 3.2.20-1
  
  Hi kernel maintainers,
  
  Gergely Nagy wrote:
  
   reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
  
  Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
  package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
  tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
  Please use plain 'linux' for now.
 
 reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.

Recent bugs reported against 'src' have X-Mailer: reportbug 6.4
Looks like reportbug is buggy too.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-07-25 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-07-25 13:30 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  Source: linux
  Version: 3.2.20-1
  
  Hi kernel maintainers,
  
  Gergely Nagy wrote:
  
   reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
  
  Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
  package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
  tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
  Please use plain 'linux' for now.
 
 reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.

 Recent bugs reported against 'src' have X-Mailer: reportbug 6.4
 Looks like reportbug is buggy too.

This seems to be a side effect of the fix for #666469, FWIW.

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-07-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2012-07-25 13:30 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
 
  On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
   Source: linux
   Version: 3.2.20-1
   
   Hi kernel maintainers,
   
   Gergely Nagy wrote:
   
reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
   
   Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
   package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
   tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
   Please use plain 'linux' for now.
  
  reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.
 
  Recent bugs reported against 'src' have X-Mailer: reportbug 6.4
  Looks like reportbug is buggy too.
 
 This seems to be a side effect of the fix for #666469, FWIW.

That looks plausible.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-06-27 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Source: linux
Version: 3.2.20-1

Hi kernel maintainers,

Gergely Nagy wrote:

 reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1

Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
Please use plain 'linux' for now.

Thanks,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 Source: linux
 Version: 3.2.20-1
 
 Hi kernel maintainers,
 
 Gergely Nagy wrote:
 
  reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
 
 Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
 package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
 tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
 Please use plain 'linux' for now.

reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
 If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-06-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  Source: linux
  Version: 3.2.20-1
  
  Hi kernel maintainers,
  
  Gergely Nagy wrote:
  
   reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
  
  Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent 'src'
  package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or some related
  tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as a package name.
  Please use plain 'linux' for now.
 
 reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.

That was easy:

diff -Nru reportbug-ng-1.26/debian/changelog 
reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- reportbug-ng-1.26/debian/changelog  2011-12-14 18:46:34.0 +
+++ reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-06-27 14:44:39.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+reportbug-ng (1.26+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix splitting of name, value in bug control file (Closes: #679252)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk  Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:41:46 +0100
+
 reportbug-ng (1.26) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix Option setting does not work (Closes: #644763)
diff -Nru reportbug-ng-1.26/src/bug.py reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/src/bug.py
--- reportbug-ng-1.26/src/bug.py2011-12-14 19:04:07.0 +
+++ reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/src/bug.py   2012-06-27 14:41:28.0 +0100
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 return control
 f = file(path)
 for line in f.readlines():
-tokens = line.split(:)
+tokens = line.split(:, 1)
 if len(tokens)  2:
 continue
 cmd = str(tokens[0].strip().lower())
--- END ---

This results in a working bug list and 'New Bugreport' dialog, but I
didn't go as far as submitting a bug.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Lowery's Law:
 If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#679252: bugs intended for linux being filed against src

2012-06-27 Thread Bastian Venthur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

sorry for the inconvenience and thank you Ben for the patch. I'll
applied and tested it, it is on it's way.


Cheers,

Bastian

Am 27.06.2012 15:50, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
 On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 14:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 Source: linux Version: 3.2.20-1
 
 Hi kernel maintainers,
 
 Gergely Nagy wrote:
 
 reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
 
 Several bugs seem to have been filed against the nonexistent
 'src' package recently.  I am guessing this means reportbug or
 some related tool does not know how to deal with 'src:linux' as
 a package name. Please use plain 'linux' for now.
 
 reportbug-ng is doing this.  Let's get it fixed.
 
 That was easy:
 
 diff -Nru reportbug-ng-1.26/debian/changelog
 reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/debian/changelog ---
 reportbug-ng-1.26/debian/changelog2011-12-14 18:46:34.0
 + +++ reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-06-27
 14:44:39.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +reportbug-ng (1.26+nmu1)
 unstable; urgency=low + +  * Fix splitting of name, value in bug
 control file (Closes: #679252) + + -- Ben Hutchings
 b...@decadent.org.uk  Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:41:46 +0100 + 
 reportbug-ng (1.26) unstable; urgency=low
 
 * Fix Option setting does not work (Closes: #644763) diff -Nru
 reportbug-ng-1.26/src/bug.py reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/src/bug.py ---
 reportbug-ng-1.26/src/bug.py  2011-12-14 19:04:07.0 + 
 +++ reportbug-ng-1.26+nmu1/src/bug.py 2012-06-27 14:41:28.0
 +0100 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ return control f = file(path) for line in
 f.readlines(): -tokens = line.split(:) +tokens =
 line.split(:, 1) if len(tokens)  2: continue cmd =
 str(tokens[0].strip().lower()) --- END ---
 
 This results in a working bug list and 'New Bugreport' dialog, but
 I didn't go as far as submitting a bug.
 
 Ben.
 

- -- 
Bastian Venthur  http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=/LrL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org