Bug#679699: RM: pppstatus -- ROM; Dead upstream (for many years), little used (2. try)
Hi! On 03.07.2012 15:22, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > now I have seen there is another tool which make (nearly) the same: slurm. > So there is no need to reactivate pppstatus. Sorry for cause trouble. Well, based upon the last source package, you fix known bugs and improve the packaging. When you have a good release ready, you can ask on the debian-mentors lists for reviews and a sponsor to upload your package to the archive. In theory your next step would then be to ask the release team for a freeze exception, providing them with a diff between the old version and the new one. However, they might not accept the introduction of new packages into the release at that point. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679699: RM: pppstatus -- ROM; Dead upstream (for many years), little used (2. try)
Hello FTP Masters, now I have seen there is another tool which make (nearly) the same: slurm. So there is no need to reactivate pppstatus. Sorry for cause trouble. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679699: RM: pppstatus -- ROM; Dead upstream (for many years), little used (2. try)
Hello FTP Masters, today I have found that pppstatus were removed from the next release and I am very surprised about this decision - and at the edge of freezing! I want to reactivate pppstatus and I would overtake upstream development and maintainance. How is the way to overtake maintainance in this state? And how is the way to reactivate this package for wheezy? --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org