Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]
please see my control file in https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/blob/master/distr/deb/debian/control first Manuel in lasted commit https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/commit/c5985e8967a2ee6b13f91d4c506b9078a2787e62 i commented all changes about name packages follow debian policy please read it carefully On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bart, 2012/8/4 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org: Hi Manuel, The package name is razor-qt on the ITP and razorqt on the RFS and at mentors. Why the difference ? Initially I was using razor-qt, then tried to follow upstream's recent names in Ubuntu's PPA: https://launchpad.net/~razor-qt/+archive/ppa/ I don't know why they decided to change, though. There are some advantages in not having the dash and those making razorqt a unit, for example, that it doesn't look like Qt's interface for package Razor, or that it helps to shorten package names in general (eg razorqt-policykit-agent instead of razor-qt-policykit-agent). But in short, there's no strong reason. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPQ4b8k91sT+jWTDpBB=60omdhc+wuftnyu_1twnewoq5o+...@mail.gmail.com -- Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qglochekone.blogspot.com
Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package razorqt. I am a DM and I already take care of a few widely used packages, I intend to keep this one in good shape as well. Initially I decided to put this one into experimental, since it's not very stable upstream and there are new versions coming soon. Related RFP/ITP bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652745 Package name: razorqt Version: 0.4.1-1~exp1 Upstream Author: Razor-qt team URL: http://razor-qt.org/ License: LGPL2.1+ Section: x11 It builds those binary packages: libqtxdg0 - Implementation of the XDG Specifications for Qt, libs libqtxdg0-dev - Implementation of the XDG Specifications for Qt, development pack librazorqt0 - Shared libraries for Razor-qt desktop environment librazorqt0-dev - Shared libraries for Razor-qt desktop environment, development pa razorqt- Lightweight desktop environment, all components razorqt-appswitcher - Application switcher component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-config - Configuration component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-data - Shared data files for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-desktop - Desktop component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-panel - Panel component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-policykit-agent - PolicyKit agent component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-power - Power manager component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-runner - Application launcher component for Razor-qt desktop environment razorqt-session - Session manager component for Razor-qt desktop environment To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/razorqt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/razorqt/razorqt_0.4.1-1~exp1.dsc There is a lintian warning related with shared libraries file, I don't know if it causes harm but the package should work all right. I would appreciate if somebody advises on how to get rid of it, never experienced it before, and it's happening only in one of the binary packages when in fact the structure for most of them is the same. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]
Hi Manuel, The package name is razor-qt on the ITP and razorqt on the RFS and at mentors. Why the difference ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]
Hi Bart, 2012/8/4 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org: Hi Manuel, The package name is razor-qt on the ITP and razorqt on the RFS and at mentors. Why the difference ? Initially I was using razor-qt, then tried to follow upstream's recent names in Ubuntu's PPA: https://launchpad.net/~razor-qt/+archive/ppa/ I don't know why they decided to change, though. There are some advantages in not having the dash and those making razorqt a unit, for example, that it doesn't look like Qt's interface for package Razor, or that it helps to shorten package names in general (eg razorqt-policykit-agent instead of razor-qt-policykit-agent). But in short, there's no strong reason. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
