Bug#688212: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2015-03-10 Thread Antoine Musso
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 06:38:02 +0200 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org 
wrote:

Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com):
 Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
 considered the definitive one.

 Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
 advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
 highlighting.

 I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other
 things right now.


Thanks for your answer, Raph. With that information and what followed
in further mails, I'll try to build a package with at least the .ttf
file and the .sfd source (if I can find my way on the repository) but,
certainly, having a disributable tarball (with README, license,
OFL-FAQ, etc. and even a Makefile, as Paul Wise suggested) would be
great. But, of course, I understand you may run short of time for
this.

We'll do our bestas often in free software..:-)


Bonjour,

I found out on wikipedia that the inconsolata font has been forked on 
Google Foot Directory. It has been fully hinted and a bold variant created.



Project directory:
https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/

Log:
https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/FONTLOG.txt


I have filled https://bugs.debian.org/780233 to request packaging of the 
fork.


--
Antoine Musso


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
(Raph, this comes from a bug report in Debian bug tracking system : 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688212)

Quoting Erik Bernstein (e...@fscking.org):
 Package: fonts-inconsolata
 Version: 001.010-4
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi,
 
 I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has problems with font
 fallback for some unicode characters with Inconsolata 1.010.
 
 You can reproduce the problem as follows:
 
 1. open a terminal and run urxvt -fn xft:inconsolata:medium:size=12
 2. execute: LANG=en_US.utf8 man groff | less -p bug-groff
 
 Have a look at the borked characters surrounding email-addresses and
 urls.  With Inconsolata 1.011 everything seems to be fine.

Sorry for answering quite late.

First of all, we'll need to keep a new upstream only in experimental
as of now, because a new upstream version doesn't fit the freeze
policy.

Still, I'd be happy to package this new upstream versionif only I
could find a place to download it.

I went here and there on Raph Levien's website and the links on the
Inconsolata page all lead me to the 1.010 version.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread erok
Hi Christian,

 
 Still, I'd be happy to package this new upstream versionif only I
 could find a place to download it.

Try google web fonts:

http://www.google.com/webfonts

- Search for Inconsolata
- Check both styles and click Add to Collection
- Click Download Your Collection

This should give you 1.011. At least that's what the .ttf tells me.

cheers,

  erik


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Raph Levien
Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
considered the definitive one.

Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
highlighting.

I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other
things right now.

Hope this helps,

Raph

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:30 AM, erok e...@fscking.org wrote:

 Hi Christian,

 
  Still, I'd be happy to package this new upstream versionif only I
  could find a place to download it.

 Try google web fonts:

 http://www.google.com/webfonts

 - Search for Inconsolata
 - Check both styles and click Add to Collection
 - Click Download Your Collection

 This should give you 1.011. At least that's what the .ttf tells me.

 cheers,

   erik



Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Paul Wise
Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Raph Levien wrote:

 Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be considered
 the definitive one.

Unfortunately Google are not distributing the source, which Debian has
promised to do as part of the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We will
need to wait until you release it.

 I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other
 things right now.

When you update the copy on your website, would it be possible for you
to create a reproducible build path with a Makefile or similar?
Currently Debian is just shipping the pre-built binary .ttf file so we
aren't sure if it is possible for our users to modify the font source
(I guess thats the spiro plates?) and rebuild the font with their
modifications.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 09:50:34AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 Ugh at websites that require JavaScript to function at all.

All fonts are available from the mercury repository, though Inconsolata
sources are missing (the src directory contains a punch of  vfb files
that are of no use to us):
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/ofl/inconsolata/

Regards,
 Khaled


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Raph Levien (raph.lev...@gmail.com):
 Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be
 considered the definitive one.
 
 Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant
 advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax
 highlighting.
 
 I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other
 things right now.


Thanks for your answer, Raph. With that information and what followed
in further mails, I'll try to build a package with at least the .ttf
file and the .sfd source (if I can find my way on the repository) but,
certainly, having a disributable tarball (with README, license,
OFL-FAQ, etc. and even a Makefile, as Paul Wise suggested) would be
great. But, of course, I understand you may run short of time for
this.

We'll do our bestas often in free software..:-)




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#688212: fonts-inconsolata: Please update Inconsolata to version 1.011

2012-09-20 Thread Erik Bernstein
Package: fonts-inconsolata
Version: 001.010-4
Severity: normal

Hi,

I've noticed that in a few cases rxvt-unicode has problems with font
fallback for some unicode characters with Inconsolata 1.010.

You can reproduce the problem as follows:

1. open a terminal and run urxvt -fn xft:inconsolata:medium:size=12
2. execute: LANG=en_US.utf8 man groff | less -p bug-groff

Have a look at the borked characters surrounding email-addresses and
urls.  With Inconsolata 1.011 everything seems to be fine.

I'm running rxvt-unicode-256color (version 9.15) and my .fonts.conf
looks like this:

match target=font 
  test name=family 
stringInconsolata/string
  /test
  edit mode=assign name=antialias 
booltrue/bool
  /edit
  edit mode=assign name=hinting 
booltrue/bool
  /edit
  edit mode=assign name=autohint 
booltrue/bool
  /edit
  edit mode=assign name=hintstyle 
consthintslight/const
  /edit
  edit mode=assign name=rgba 
constnone/const
  /edit
/match


cheers,
  erik

-- Package-specific info:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersion  Architecture Description
+++-===---
ii  fontconfig  2.9.0-7  amd64generic font 
configuration library - support binarie
ii  libfreetype6:amd64  2.4.9-1  amd64FreeType 2 font 
engine, shared library files
ii  libxft2:amd64   2.3.1-1  amd64FreeType-based 
font drawing library for X

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org