Bug#696141: kdenetwork: FTBFS: moc: .../kopete/protocols/sms/gsmlibprefs.h: No such file

2012-12-24 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: found -1 4:4.8.4-1
Control: notfound -1 4.8.4-1

On 2012-12-17 08:29:22, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
 Source: kdenetwork
 Version: 4.8.4-1

It looks like you've forgot the epoch. Fixing the version information.

Regards
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#696141: kdenetwork: FTBFS: moc: .../kopete/protocols/sms/gsmlibprefs.h: No such file

2012-12-24 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important

Hi Thorsten,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:29:22AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
 kdenetwork fails to build, apparently looking for a file which it
 generated a few lines above, according to the attached build log.

I tried on amd64 with pbuilder in wheezy and sid, and manually in a clean
sid chroot (running debian/rules build-arch ; debian/rules binary-arch). Those
3 runs finished without failures.

Can you think of a way to reproduce this on a release arch?

I'm downgrading the bug because m68k is not a release arch.

Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#696141: kdenetwork: FTBFS: moc: .../kopete/protocols/sms/gsmlibprefs.h: No such file

2012-12-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ivo De Decker dixit:

I tried on amd64 with pbuilder in wheezy and sid, and manually in a clean
sid chroot (running debian/rules build-arch ; debian/rules binary-arch). Those
3 runs finished without failures.

My guess is that the lines that say
/tmp/buildd/kdenetwork-4.8.4/kopete/protocols/sms/services/gsmlib.h:0: Note: No 
relevant classes found. No output generated.
and similar are the cause of this.

Maybe the thing that’s generated, like gsmlibprefs.h, is
arch-dependent, and if there’s nothing, instead of making
an empty one it deletes it or doesn’t create it, thus
failing the build.

But I’ve not looked in-depth.

Can you think of a way to reproduce this on a release arch?

No, since it did not FTBFS there, unless someone figures
out why the file’s not there on m68k in the first place…

I'm downgrading the bug because m68k is not a release arch.

Agreed, as long as it’s still fixed eventually ;-)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
 seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
 seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org