Bug#696631: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: '+' is allowed in package names
Hi Salvatore, On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:45:24 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: When running cme check dpkg in the gcc-mingw-w64 source, I get failures related to the use of '+' in a package name: Warning in 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' value 'g++-mingw-w64': package g is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package. Configuration item 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' has a wrong value: dependency 'g++-mingw-w64' does not match grammar As far as I'm aware this package name is perfectly legal. Unfortunately my perl-fu doesn't extend far enough to fix this... This is correct[1]. According to Debian policy 5.6.1 Source, package names must consist only of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9), plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and periods (.). They must be at least two characters long and must start with an alphanumeric character. [...] I have commited a tentative fix for this to our git repo, but would be good if Dominique Dumont can have a look at it before releasing. p.s.: During playing around with gcc-mingw-w64 noticed there is also missing support for Built-Using field. Reported this as #696768[2]. [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/696768 Thanks! I had noticed the Built-Using error as well, but hadn't got round to filing a bug for it. Regards, Stephen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#696631: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: '+' is allowed in package names
Le Wednesday 26 December 2012 23:45:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : I have commited a tentative fix for this to our git repo, but would be good if Dominique Dumont can have a look at it before releasing. The patch is fine with me. Thanks for the help Dominique signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#696631: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: '+' is allowed in package names
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Stephen On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Dear Maintainer, When running cme check dpkg in the gcc-mingw-w64 source, I get failures related to the use of '+' in a package name: Warning in 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' value 'g++-mingw-w64': package g is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package. Configuration item 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' has a wrong value: dependency 'g++-mingw-w64' does not match grammar As far as I'm aware this package name is perfectly legal. Unfortunately my perl-fu doesn't extend far enough to fix this... This is correct[1]. According to Debian policy 5.6.1 Source, package names must consist only of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9), plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and periods (.). They must be at least two characters long and must start with an alphanumeric character. [1]: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Source I have commited a tentative fix for this to our git repo, but would be good if Dominique Dumont can have a look at it before releasing. p.s.: During playing around with gcc-mingw-w64 noticed there is also missing support for Built-Using field. Reported this as #696768[2]. [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/696768 Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#696631: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: '+' is allowed in package names
Package: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl Version: 2.031 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When running cme check dpkg in the gcc-mingw-w64 source, I get failures related to the use of '+' in a package name: Warning in 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' value 'g++-mingw-w64': package g is unknown. Check for typos if not a virtual package. Configuration item 'control binary:gcc-mingw-w64 Recommends:0' has a wrong value: dependency 'g++-mingw-w64' does not match grammar As far as I'm aware this package name is perfectly legal. Unfortunately my perl-fu doesn't extend far enough to fix this... Regards, Stephen -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libconfig-model-dpkg-perl depends on: ii libany-moose-perl 0.17-1 ii libanyevent-http-perl 2.14-1 ii libanyevent-perl 7.010-1 ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.26+b1 ii libconfig-model-perl 2.029-1 ii libfile-homedir-perl 0.99-1 ii liblog-log4perl-perl 1.29-1 ii libmouse-perl 0.99-1 ii libparse-recdescent-perl 1.967009+dfsg-1 ii libsoftware-license-perl 0.103005-1 ii libtext-autoformat-perl 1.669002-1 ii libtext-diff-perl 1.41-1 ii libyaml-perl 0.81-1 ii lintian 2.5.10.3 ii perl 5.14.2-16 Versions of packages libconfig-model-dpkg-perl recommends: ii libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.337-2 ii libmodule-corelist-perl 2.68-1 ii perl5.14.2-16 ii perl-modules [libmodule-corelist-perl] 5.14.2-16 libconfig-model-dpkg-perl suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
