Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: extra bonus points if you could tell how many commits it are in each branch, due to rebase its rather easy for me to find out, but becoming this told would be even better ;) As I have been keeping up with the changes in develop this week since your rebase request, those numbers have changed a couple of times. Regarding merging into develop: yes, I want. But first I want to finish merging Andreas current bits, then merge that develop into piatti (and run it there) and then merge these two branches of yours. Ok. It would have been easier for me if this had been established before you asked for my rebase. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dave Steele dste...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: ... these are quite some different changes, can you please isolate the commits for Sort known issues by reverse dependency count and rebase them onto current develop?! The new serial branches sort-issues-by-rdep and sort-issues-by-rdep-fast are separated from the rest of the work, and rebased to develop. I should mention that there is the line PROBLEM_DIR = os.environ['HOME'] + /bin/known_problems in the code. I run a stock install - that line is modified in my test branch. PROBLEM_DIR will need to default to /usr/share/piuparts/master/known_problems/ to clear the 0.50 TODO list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count
Hi Dave, On Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013, Dave Steele wrote: The rest of my proposed changes for known problem handling are pushed, for review. A rebase is needed before merging. I will do this at your request. The following serial branch heads are involved: well-known - I've added tolerance for missing files and packages, and added PTS links fast-problems - replaced grep shell calls with python re. Per the commit: Run with full .kpr replacement is 2 1/2 minutes vs. 28 minutes for grep, per section, with stale file buffers, and idle slaves. Subsequent runs are 15 seconds vs. 60 seconds. Replacing the packagesdb rdep sort with an alpha sort reduces that to 5 seconds. fast-report - detect_well_known_errors is morphed into the piupartslib module 'known_problems', and is and called from piuparts-report. Report runs always include issues and error summaries now. report_problem_integration - replace linktarget_by_template with known_problem module support. All problem definition information is encoded in the conf file. piatti-problems - known_problems uses the packaged dir for the problem files. A new known-problem-directory config parameter lets piatti set it back to under /org these are quite some different changes, can you please isolate the commits for Sort known issues by reverse dependency count and rebase them onto current develop?! cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count
Hi, On Samstag, 19. Januar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Without having looked at the code yet, I like the idea :-) same here :) Now that you have access to the package DB, can you add a PTS link for each failing package? These need to be src based ... I'd prefer this as well... cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698526: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#698526: Bug#698526: Sort known issues by reverse dependency count
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de wrote: On 2013-01-19 22:06, Dave Steele wrote: ... Now that you have access to the package DB, can you add a PTS link for each failing package? These need to be src based ... Yes, but it would involve duplicating a bit of code from piuparts-report. What are you thinking, replace e.g. pass/python-support_1.0.15.log with pass/python-support_1.0.15, and link to the source page instead of the log? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
