Bug#701152: works for me

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Vincent Lefevre  [2015-11-25 20:53 +1300]:
> > You could make wicd-daemon depend on resolvconf and then register
> > the static DNS servers at a higher priority than those provided by
> > DHCP.
> 
> No! wicd does not need resolvconf at all.

Well, but resolvconf would be a solution to the problem.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft  @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Bug#701152: works for me

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Vincent Lefevre  [2015-11-23 23:02 +1300]:
> I haven't tried again, but it wasn't working in August 2015, and
> the only change that was done since is:
> 
>   * Support newer python-urwid (Closes: #800693)
> 
> But as I've said, I don't see this as a wicd issue. If something
> needs to be done, it is rather on the DHCP client side.

You could make wicd-daemon depend on resolvconf and then register
the static DNS servers at a higher priority than those provided by
DHCP.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft  @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Bug#701152: works for me

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2015-11-25 15:24:34 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Vincent Lefevre  [2015-11-23 23:02 +1300]:
> > I haven't tried again, but it wasn't working in August 2015, and
> > the only change that was done since is:
> > 
> >   * Support newer python-urwid (Closes: #800693)
> > 
> > But as I've said, I don't see this as a wicd issue. If something
> > needs to be done, it is rather on the DHCP client side.
> 
> You could make wicd-daemon depend on resolvconf and then register
> the static DNS servers at a higher priority than those provided by
> DHCP.

No! wicd does not need resolvconf at all.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Bug#701152: works for me

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2015-11-23 10:43:30 +0100, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
> Is this issue still occurring? It works for me

I haven't tried again, but it wasn't working in August 2015, and
the only change that was done since is:

  * Support newer python-urwid (Closes: #800693)

But as I've said, I don't see this as a wicd issue. If something
needs to be done, it is rather on the DHCP client side.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Bug#701152: works for me

[Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli]

tags +moreinfo
thanks

Is this issue still occurring? It works for me