Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest. I'd recommend uploading without delay. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
On 06/17/13 21:27, Sam Hartman wrote: If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest. I'd recommend uploading without delay. I can't but I think it may be preferable since the landing of version in experimental may encounter some delay, krb5 is widely linked Regards -- Gianluigi Tiesi sher...@netfarm.it EDP Project Leader Netfarm S.r.l. - http://www.netfarm.it/ Free Software: http://oss.netfarm.it/ Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the discussion. Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want to revert this change... So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway. /me wishes that uploads were blocked if reverse build dependencies fails to build. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
Raphael == Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes: Raphael On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the discussion. Raphael Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want Raphael to revert this change... Raphael So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway. Was planning on it eventually; just had hoped to get the small change in. As it turns out krb5 upstream has abandoned texinfo as their doc system. Ben kaduk has done most of the work of moving to the new upstream version so i'll do that. It means not fixing the kpasswd security issue for testing for longer as I suspect I'll hold that in unstable for a while. Raphael /me wishes that uploads were blocked if reverse build Raphael dependencies fails to build. or at least there was a way to file a serious bug and tell the buildds to use a version in testing say for a month or two while the issue was resolved one way or another. Raphael Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog â Debian Raphael Developer Raphael Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: â Raphael http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote: As it turns out krb5 upstream has abandoned texinfo as their doc system. Ben kaduk has done most of the work of moving to the new upstream version so i'll do that. https://github.com/kaduk/krb5/commits/debian-1.11 is where my current version lives. The HEAD as of right now (b9a45204a146f7b97a688dcff8dca6e98371e02e) has two issues that should be fixed: it is based off upstream's 1.11.1 release but upstream has come out with 1.11.2 since then, and the gbp.conf it includes misspells pristine-tar. I may have time to make those updates today, in which case the github URL will be destructively updated to the fixed version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
Actually, it's probably easier if I make the updates. rationale: You have your repo mixed in with something else. It makes a bit harder to construct the initial dpm state. but I can take what you have and the 1.11.2 tarball and prepsource myself and then rsync the repo into place on alioth. It probably will not be today though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update. how critical is that? do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote: As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update. how critical is that? do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5? I'm not entirely sure. I think that the libverto update addressed some issues with respect to dladdr() dependencies which made building difficult on exotic platforms, but it also added some new functionality. I'm not sure whether consumers of that functionality are in the tree yet, I know of one that is out-of-tree which is a KDC plugin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
Package: src:krb5 Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=krb5ver=1.10.1%2Bdfsg-6 Cheers, gregor -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRlq3/AAoJELs6aAGGSaoG6hIP/AhafJVmBUPxeygQGRrdDhtu AMss2fNwHw/wn7jbNvDWxQXkgM6moaPVtolNXqLuyltIwQl7Jbnf9eK4mRJ0sxeD Cpa87oLHowm1Mc3HQgBMmp77pB2CIm0pX7u6he0LywEFxqx+Ob/vLxA/1kFByiyt /vyUCng230nGuGS5evbrUhTsksdNKaLsL6uBeqPFlR11CpGhZ8mVL6xs2JsBpGzv VdDdLM21CNHKppybs/NHztsj1OQJvmXJBJnWptuw8+zgdxPKxKJCiLeuJcMPyuxy 890rRmvDjvcthPki3LG4EkwkxtsERj5RsU3e6taDHNGpQhQmUWCx9SIkdVVings6 fJA4c6v4IHXuCjV0SdmqusdIVqA9fXVjBGlAGv8s/VCo6PNNdlKI5oQv+cXuFgQM arSMrUAtqidshBQA0ptQQ8mvdf2/et4dRYOTxF/Zj8yXlrmtGkLvHv4XHgPAFtGw JCbENuRiTefjhejbd/it92qFtFpK3Q+PSDowhl/XEO2TEH7Fqi7v5LMwmcRVRK1h 0vCNAzvv4tlYHQBKhZU/VJmGBsT2WapL6rWfO07B0u7wJfq2sJzE6YCD7ZgBlevL 06xDlhZCHIit2PQ/P6AfjZ7f9mZAKWoMR1SdkQd8nEatbcCW/hfuD87H6RmcfW1p fUw48ze+6/5uY4qfvyFE =1nHB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org writes: Package: src:krb5 Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) 1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=krb5ver=1.10.1%2Bdfsg-6 See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the discussion. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
