Bug#728802: calendar-exchange-provider: Impossible to connect to exchange calendar after 24.0 upgrade (it connect but calendar is RO)
On 11/05/2013 08:08 PM, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi, On 5.11.2013 18:13, Eric Valette wrote: Running tb 24.1, lightning 2.6.2 and calendar-exchange-provider 3.2.0-beta57 on a windows VM on the same machine works with same settings. Where did you come to beta57? The latest tarball I see available for download is beta52 and in git is beta53. I goofed (probably mixing the old beta47 on linux and beta52 on windows). Could you update icedove, iceowl-extension and calendar-exchange-provider to the same version. I've packaged ~beta53 that declares it's compatible with TB 24.0 [1] and contacted my sponsor. He is quite fast with reviewing so hopefully this time it won't be an exception. The upload will be into experimental (that's where Icedove 24.0 is). I confirm the bug is fixed here. Thanks for your responsiveness. Is icedove 24.0 really TB 24.0 or 24.0.1 because 24.0.1 requires lightning 2.6.1 and 24.1 requires lightning 2.6.2... AFAIK icedove and iceowl-extension are built from the very same source tarball, so there shouldn't arise any version incompatibilities between these two. Right. Just the beta3 is confusing but I assume 2.6beta3 = 2.6. Thanks for your support. -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#728802: calendar-exchange-provider: Impossible to connect to exchange calendar after 24.0 upgrade (it connect but calendar is RO)
Package: calendar-exchange-provider Version: 3.2.0~beta47-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have an exchange 2010 server than worked well with 17.0.x. I use iceowl-extension and calendar-exchange-provider debian packages and not the upstream binary version of the equivalent package. I can create the calendar but it reamin RO whatever I do and I cannot fetch existing appointments. Running tb 24.1, lightning 2.6.2 and calendar-exchange-provider 3.2.0-beta57 on a windows VM on the same machine works with same settings. Could you update icedove, iceowl-extension and calendar-exchange-provider to the same version. Is icedove 24.0 really TB 24.0 or 24.0.1 because 24.0.1 requires lightning 2.6.1 and 24.1 requires lightning 2.6.2... This is very annoying as I have lost all my apointments. Deinstalling, deleting calendars, even removing the leftover in prefs.js doesnt fix it. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.10.17 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages calendar-exchange-provider depends on: ii icedove 24.0-1 ii iceowl-extension 24.0-1 calendar-exchange-provider recommends no packages. calendar-exchange-provider suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#728802: calendar-exchange-provider: Impossible to connect to exchange calendar after 24.0 upgrade (it connect but calendar is RO)
Hi, On 5.11.2013 18:13, Eric Valette wrote: Running tb 24.1, lightning 2.6.2 and calendar-exchange-provider 3.2.0-beta57 on a windows VM on the same machine works with same settings. Where did you come to beta57? The latest tarball I see available for download is beta52 and in git is beta53. Could you update icedove, iceowl-extension and calendar-exchange-provider to the same version. I've packaged ~beta53 that declares it's compatible with TB 24.0 [1] and contacted my sponsor. He is quite fast with reviewing so hopefully this time it won't be an exception. The upload will be into experimental (that's where Icedove 24.0 is). Is icedove 24.0 really TB 24.0 or 24.0.1 because 24.0.1 requires lightning 2.6.1 and 24.1 requires lightning 2.6.2... AFAIK icedove and iceowl-extension are built from the very same source tarball, so there shouldn't arise any version incompatibilities between these two. Regards, Jakub [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/calendar-exchange-provider -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
