> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 23:45:57 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 03/18/2014 06:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 00:56:48 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg >> >> 8) binnmu gdal 1.10.1+dfsg-4 in unstable >> >> With both spatialite and librasterlite built on all architectures, >> it's time for GDAL: >> >> nmu gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-4+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libspatialite5" >> > I'm waiting for the current version here (for the armadillo transition) > to move to testing, which should happen tonight.
Thanks, that's the last package left for SpatiaLite. >> >> 9) binnmu merkaartor 0.18.1-3 in unstable >> >> Can be scheduled now too, or maybe wait for GDAL first. >> >> nmu merkaartor_0.18.1-3+b2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libspatialite5" >> > I'll do that together with gdal. merkaartor was already rebuild for libgps21, which also used the new spatialite. >> >> 10) upload osgearth 2.5.0+dfsg-1 to unstable 11) upload >> >> qgis 2.2.0-1 to unstable >> >> Will happen after the GDAL rebuild. >> > Looks like that's happened anyway. Correct. Because they also depend on libgdal-dev it seemed appropriate to order them after GDAL in the sequence, but it's not a strict requirement. > Is anyone taking care of mapnik? I had a look at the suggested patch to backport, but this is non-trivial. Jérémy said he doesn't have time to look at mapnik in the next two weeks, but I intent to try the patch backport in the mean time. I haven't had much time to work on the patch backport, so there is nothing tangible yet. Kind Regards, Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org