Bug#734597: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#734597: litecoin: Litecoin still builds with system LevelDB

2016-05-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Dmitry Smirnov (2016-05-19 06:45:36)
> On Monday, 10 February 2014 11:56:48 AM AEST Scott Howard wrote:
>> At some point we should move to system libraries and help bitcoin 
>> developers with the appropriate tests and mechanisms so they can 
>> trust system libraries as well. I don't think we are at that point 
>> yet.
>
> I think it is not about trust. It would be crazy to build private 
> version of let's say MySQL and let Litecoin to link it statically. As 
> far as I'm aware Litecin just stores raw key/value data without any 
> advanced features like triggers or stored procedures. They could have 
> used file system to store that (although it probably wouldn't be very 
> efficient). Therefore there is a little risk of using system LevelDB 
> library that at least runs its own post- build tests suite on every 
> re-build.
>
> I have no confidence in upstream ability to effectively track updates 
> in bundled libraries.
>
> I hope it makes sense.

I perfectly agree, and am happy for the comment on this bugreport 
drawing my attention to it.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#734597: [Pkg-bitcoin-devel] Bug#734597: litecoin: Litecoin still builds with system LevelDB

2014-01-08 Thread Scott Howard
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote:
 On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:22:37 Micha wrote:
 It would be better to change Litecoin to use the bundled LevelDB,
 for the same reason as that is already being done with Bitcoin.

 Actually I disagree that it would be better to use bundled LevelDB.

See:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1naenR6N6fMWSpHM0f4jpQhYBEkCEQDbLBs8AXC19Y-o/edit#heading=h.i7tz3gqh65mi
and
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=31207353
for detailed discussion and justification from upstream.

If you disagree, I'd be interested in hearing why.
Cheers,
Scott


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org