Bug#738181: vmm: Please recommend or suggest the package `postfix-pgsql`

2014-02-08 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Samstag, den 08.02.2014, 13:00 +0100 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Paul Menzel  [2014-02-08 12:13 +0100]:
> > Installing the package `postfix-pgsql` fixes this, so could you please
> > make this a recommendation or suggestion of the package vmm please?
> > `dovecot-pgsql` is already a recommendation.
> 
> Since postfix-pgsql depends on postfix, which conflicts with the
> Debian default MTA, I don't think a recommendation makes sense.

Ah, I was not aware of that this is going to cause problems. Has a
suggestion the same problem?

> I don't even think dovecot-pgsql should be recommended, as vmm can
> be used far away from the database or mailserver.

But the package `postfix` is already recommended and the files under
`/usr/share/doc/vmm` also suggest, that the main usage is indented with
PostgreSQL and Postfix. So if a suggestion works out, that would be
great.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#738181: vmm: Please recommend or suggest the package `postfix-pgsql`

2014-02-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Menzel  [2014-02-08 12:13 +0100]:
> Installing the package `postfix-pgsql` fixes this, so could you please
> make this a recommendation or suggestion of the package vmm please?
> `dovecot-pgsql` is already a recommendation.

Since postfix-pgsql depends on postfix, which conflicts with the
Debian default MTA, I don't think a recommendation makes sense.

I don't even think dovecot-pgsql should be recommended, as vmm can
be used far away from the database or mailserver.

I'll be happy to be told differently…

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Bug#738181: vmm: Please recommend or suggest the package `postfix-pgsql`

2014-02-08 Thread Paul Menzel
Package: vmm
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: normal

Dear Debian folks,


installing the package vmm, it did not work correctly because the
dictionary type `pgsql` was missing.

postfix/proxymap[3730]: error: unsupported dictionary type: pgsql

Installing the package `postfix-pgsql` fixes this, so could you please
make this a recommendation or suggestion of the package vmm please?
`dovecot-pgsql` is already a recommendation.

This would be useful for stable update too in my opinion. No idea if it
is worth the effort though.


Thanks,

Paul


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part