Bug#748387: liblockfile: missing debian/copyright

2014-05-20 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg 

On 16/05/14 22:06, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

I noticed it while trying to read the copyright file through
packages.qa.debian.org.  Looks like the binary packages are okay, and
the information's there in the source package --- the path is just
wrong.


Yes. I really need to dh-ize the debian directory. I did see the light 
quite some time ago but I never got around to updating liblockfile. I'm 
putting it on the agenda.


Mike.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#748387: liblockfile: missing debian/copyright

2014-05-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder 
Source: liblockfile
Version: 1.09-6
Severity: serious
Justification: policy 4.5

In liblockfile 1.09-6:

 $ ls debian/
 changelog
 control
 liblockfile-bin.overrides
 patches
 postinst
 postrm
 rules
 shlibs
 source
 $ tar -tf ../liblockfile_1.09-6.debian.tar.bz2
 debian/
 debian/control
 debian/source/
 debian/source/options
 debian/source/format
 debian/rules
 debian/patches/
 debian/patches/series
 debian/patches/fix-buffer-overflows.patch
 debian/patches/688074-Makefile.in-NVER.patch
 debian/patches/Makefile.in.patch
 debian/liblockfile-bin.overrides
 debian/shlibs
 debian/changelog
 debian/postrm
 debian/postinst

The copyright file appears to be missing.

Thanks,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#748387: liblockfile: missing debian/copyright

2014-05-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (2014-05-16):
 Source: liblockfile
 Version: 1.09-6
 Severity: serious
 Justification: policy 4.5

What you're talking about is a 'should' in Policy 12.5; doesn't look
like a serious bug to me.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#748387: liblockfile: missing debian/copyright

2014-05-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder 
severity 748387 important
quit

Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com (2014-05-16):

 Source: liblockfile
 Version: 1.09-6
 Severity: serious
 Justification: policy 4.5

 What you're talking about is a 'should' in Policy 12.5; doesn't look
 like a serious bug to me.

Good catch.

I noticed it while trying to read the copyright file through
packages.qa.debian.org.  Looks like the binary packages are okay, and
the information's there in the source package --- the path is just
wrong.

Thanks,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org