Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
On 16/07/14 13:13, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Okay, it seems Samuli Suominen has written a patch already. I'll try > it tonight and upload new wmbattery and sleepd if it works. That is great news! Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
On 16 July 2014 13:10, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On 16 July 2014 12:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > The package is orphaned but not abandoned. I'm the original author of > upower.c. As it worked for me, there was no need to rewrite it until > the new upower introduced the breakage. I still have the old upower, > and I don't have time to check what's broken. Okay, it seems Samuli Suominen has written a patch already. I'll try it tonight and upload new wmbattery and sleepd if it works. -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
Hello, On 16 July 2014 12:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Andreas, I'd expect a patch from you prior to the upload of a newer >> upower. I currently have no time nor desire to review the API changes >> to perform the porting, so a tested and working patch would really >> help. > This package is orphaned and abandoned upstream, so I didn't consider it a > blocker for the transition. If you care about it, perhaps you can fix this bug > and adopt the package? I haven't checked how much porting work is needed here, > but upower.c is small so hopefully it's not too bad. The package is orphaned but not abandoned. I'm the original author of upower.c. As it worked for me, there was no need to rewrite it until the new upower introduced the breakage. I still have the old upower, and I don't have time to check what's broken. Anyway, this feels really weird. We've been told that using /proc and /sys is bad, as those interfaces are unstable and can change any time. Also we've been told that upower is Teh Stable Interface to use. Okay, we use it. And now it breaks, while users of /sys don't have any problems at all. -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
Hi Andrew, On 14/07/14 11:39, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On 14 July 2014 11:25, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >> The upower transitions (#751953) has now been started and this >> makes your package fail to build from source in unstable. > > Andreas, I'd expect a patch from you prior to the upload of a newer > upower. I currently have no time nor desire to review the API changes > to perform the porting, so a tested and working patch would really > help. This package is orphaned and abandoned upstream, so I didn't consider it a blocker for the transition. If you care about it, perhaps you can fix this bug and adopt the package? I haven't checked how much porting work is needed here, but upower.c is small so hopefully it's not too bad. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
Hello, On 14 July 2014 11:25, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > The upower transitions (#751953) has now been started and this > makes your package fail to build from source in unstable. Andreas, I'd expect a patch from you prior to the upload of a newer upower. I currently have no time nor desire to review the API changes to perform the porting, so a tested and working patch would really help. -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#752443: upower 0.99 transition started
Control: severity -1 serious Hello! The upower transitions (#751953) has now been started and this makes your package fail to build from source in unstable. Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
