Bug#770814: packagekit-gtk3-module: should depend on packagekit
Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2014-11-25 02:01:39)
2014-11-24 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
Seems package packagekit-gtk3-module is missing a dependency on
packagekit.
The package depends on libpackagekit-glib, which itself recommends
packagekit. Therefore, everything should be fine here.
It seems to me that packagekit-gtk3-module 1.0.1-1 on amd64 do not
depend on anything *packagekit*, nor does it have any reverse
dependencies/recommandations/suggestions at all. It seems to me that
(at least that particular version on this particular architecture) the
package is untied to other parts of packagekit.
Seems an issue also for Jessie - here's on a clean jessie chroot:
root@bastian:/# aptitude --with-recommends install
packagekit-gtk3-module
The following NEW packages will be installed:
adwaita-icon-theme{a} at-spi2-core{a} colord{a} colord-data{a} dbus{a}
dconf-gsettings-backend{a} dconf-service{a} fontconfig{a} fontconfig-config{a}
fonts-dejavu-core{a} glib-networking{a} glib-networking-common{a}
glib-networking-services{a} gsettings-desktop-schemas{a} hicolor-icon-theme{a}
krb5-locales{a} libatk-bridge2.0-0{a} libatk1.0-0{a} libatk1.0-data{a}
libatspi2.0-0{a} libavahi-client3{a} libavahi-common-data{a}
libavahi-common3{a} libcairo-gobject2{a} libcairo2{a} libcap-ng0{a}
libcolord2{a} libcolorhug2{a} libcroco3{a} libcups2{a} libdatrie1{a}
libdbus-1-3{a} libdconf1{a} libexif12{a} libexpat1{a} libffi6{a}
libfile-copy-recursive-perl{a} libfontconfig1{a} libfreetype6{a} libgd3{a}
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0{a} libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common{a} libglib2.0-0{a}
libglib2.0-data{a} libgnutls-deb0-28{a} libgphoto2-6{a} libgphoto2-l10n{a}
libgphoto2-port10{a} libgraphite2-3{a} libgssapi-krb5-2{a} libgtk-3-0{a}
libgtk-3-bin{a} libgtk-3-common{a} libgudev-1.0-0{a} libgusb2{a}
libharfbuzz0b{a} libhogweed2{a} libieee1284-3{a} libjasper1{a} libjbig0{a}
libjpeg62-turbo{a} libjson-glib-1.0-0{a} libjson-glib-1.0-common{a}
libk5crypto3{a} libkeyutils1{a} libkrb5-3{a} libkrb5support0{a} liblcms2-2{a}
libltdl7{a} libnettle4{a} libp11-kit0{a} libpam-systemd{a} libpango-1.0-0{a}
libpangocairo-1.0-0{a} libpangoft2-1.0-0{a} libpixman-1-0{a} libpng12-0{a}
libpolkit-agent-1-0{a} libpolkit-backend-1-0{a} libpolkit-gobject-1-0{a}
libproxy1{a} librest-0.7-0{a} librsvg2-2{a} librsvg2-common{a} libsane{a}
libsane-common{a} libsane-extras{a} libsane-extras-common{a}
libsoup-gnome2.4-1{a} libsoup2.4-1{a} libtasn1-6{a} libthai-data{a} libthai0{a}
libtiff5{a} libusb-1.0-0{a} libv4l-0{a} libv4lconvert0{a} libvpx1{a}
libwayland-client0{a} libwayland-cursor0{a} libx11-6{a} libx11-data{a}
libxau6{a} libxcb-render0{a} libxcb-shm0{a} libxcb1{a} libxcomposite1{a}
libxcursor1{a} libxdamage1{a} libxdmcp6{a} libxext6{a} libxfixes3{a} libxi6{a}
libxinerama1{a} libxkbcommon0{a} libxml2{a} libxpm4{a} libxrandr2{a}
libxrender1{a} libxtst6{a} packagekit-gtk3-module policykit-1{a} sane-utils{a}
sgml-base{a} shared-mime-info{a} ucf{a} update-inetd{a} x11-common{a}
xdg-user-dirs{a} xkb-data{a} xml-core{a}
0 packages upgraded, 131 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
Need to get 47.1 MB of archives. After unpacking 152 MB will be used.
Nothing *packagekit* other than the package itself will get installed.
What did you do to end up on a system w/o packagekit?
I did not use it on a system, just browsed around in aptitude to locate
packagekit-related resources, for having it covered in Boxer:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/boxer/boxer-data.git/commit/?id=c79e4d5
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
Bug#770814: packagekit-gtk3-module: should depend on packagekit
2014-11-25 12:34 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2014-11-25 02:01:39) 2014-11-24 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Seems package packagekit-gtk3-module is missing a dependency on packagekit. The package depends on libpackagekit-glib, which itself recommends packagekit. Therefore, everything should be fine here. It seems to me that packagekit-gtk3-module 1.0.1-1 on amd64 do not depend on anything *packagekit*, nor does it have any reverse dependencies/recommandations/suggestions at all. It seems to me that (at least that particular version on this particular architecture) the package is untied to other parts of packagekit. Indeed. How did you notice that PackageKit is missing? Does this change lead to any error messages? This package should likely depend on a PackageKit session interface (gnome-packagekit-session | apper). Cheers, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770814: packagekit-gtk3-module: should depend on packagekit
Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2014-11-25 15:52:42) 2014-11-25 12:34 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Matthias Klumpp (2014-11-25 02:01:39) 2014-11-24 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Seems package packagekit-gtk3-module is missing a dependency on packagekit. The package depends on libpackagekit-glib, which itself recommends packagekit. Therefore, everything should be fine here. It seems to me that packagekit-gtk3-module 1.0.1-1 on amd64 do not depend on anything *packagekit*, nor does it have any reverse dependencies/recommandations/suggestions at all. It seems to me that (at least that particular version on this particular architecture) the package is untied to other parts of packagekit. Indeed. How did you notice that PackageKit is missing? Does this change lead to any error messages? As I told you, I browsed with aptitude. No, I saw no error messages. Ahh, perhaps you are simply unaware of the curses interface of aptitude: 1) Execute aptitude with no other arguments to reach fullscreen mode 2) type /packagekit-gt and hit ENTER to locate the package 3) hit ENTER to see package details 4) move down to Packages depending on... and hit ENTER to see reverse dependencies This package should likely depend on a PackageKit session interface (gnome-packagekit-session | apper). IMO it should depend on whatever provides the dbus interface (as I guess it is completely useless for anyone without the dbus interface), but only enhance user interfaces of packagekit (not depend/recommend/suggest as the relationship is directional: Seem this is similar to a plugin, which means it is the other tools that benefit from the addition of this one). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#770814: packagekit-gtk3-module: should depend on packagekit
Source: packagekit Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Seems package packagekit-gtk3-module is missing a dependency on packagekit. - Jonas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUcxRYXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ3NjQ4ODQwMTIyRTJDNTBFQzUxRDQwRTI0 RUMxQjcyMjM3NEY5QkQ2AAoJEE7BtyI3T5vWGhoIAITIs6LAzhxKMDyIaYY8eR5C 6A9ExiJwCURktF/WRe5j1trmJq7NPqXN5NyIR9aqAG03zBlV49ImVu4GbH19ntBd 7u17h10PvppyJBRwGHByq1bMT76VuMxRqYZmCkHFNGZN9/zu58qQo3B6Wt7weXtG PWNFfijVwsham4f6nST2JwI3XnN1NjLBVP6srsiphba5niE/PQN6p+bSca3DATDs mPI+wm6jwy/Biguo42OqGpoVSm5XCzgGKxTG2ncEAv70SAlC/6GmZu7Ky+r9rXf4 WfFx2+GnWZdnSF4mYANocIwmzZF29N6G3lxD0WNO6EKsXj7idc0j3PtGAS/+ljg= =3G15 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#770814: packagekit-gtk3-module: should depend on packagekit
Hi! 2014-11-24 12:19 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Source: packagekit Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Seems package packagekit-gtk3-module is missing a dependency on packagekit. The package depends on libpackagekit-glib, which itself recommends packagekit. Therefore, everything should be fine here. What did you do to end up on a system w/o packagekit? Cheers, Matthias -- Debian Developer | Freedesktop-Developer I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
