Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Jacob Adams wrote: My only remaining issue is installation of the manpage. There is a debian/beret.6 file but it is not installed for some reason. How can I install it? The best way is for the manual page to get included upstream and installed by the upstream build system. Until that happens, please refer to the dh_installman documentation. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
I have been busy and put this aside for too long. On 01/25/2015 11:25 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Jacob Adams wrote: At this point the only remaining problems with my package appear to be binary-without-manpage and debian-watch-file-is-missing which also shows up in fonts-averia-sans. That sounds like a bug in lintian, it should not emit that warning for watch files containing only comments. The watch file has been fixed. It wasn't a bug in lintian, I simply did not comment properly. My only remaining issue is installation of the manpage. There is a debian/beret.6 file but it is not installed for some reason. How can I install it? -- Jacob Adams GPG Key: AF6B 1C26 E2D0 A988 432B 94F4 24C0 2B85 B59F E5A9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Jacob Adams wrote: At this point the only remaining problems with my package appear to be binary-without-manpage and debian-watch-file-is-missing which also shows up in fonts-averia-sans. beret has a manpage, so should I override that? AFAICT the manual page isn't installed in the package so the lintian warning is valid. Neither package uses tarballs, and lintian suggests explain why I cannot use a watch file in a watch file but doing so brings up a even more severe warning (debian-watch-file-missing-version). What should I do? That sounds like a bug in lintian, it should not emit that warning for watch files containing only comments. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
On 01/25/2015 12:40 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jacob Adams wrote: It builds those binary packages: beret - Adventures of a telekinetic scientist beret-data - Data for Beret, the adventures of a telekinetic scientist fonts-averia - Averia TrueType Font The Averia font appears to be a separate project and should be packaged from a separate source package rather than the embedded copy of the font being packaged. http://iotic.com/averia/ Fixed. http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-averia-sans I am also now uploading a fixed version of beret that uses fonts-averia-sans At this point the only remaining problems with my package appear to be binary-without-manpage and debian-watch-file-is-missing which also shows up in fonts-averia-sans. beret has a manpage, so should I override that? Neither package uses tarballs, and lintian suggests explain why I cannot use a watch file in a watch file but doing so brings up a even more severe warning (debian-watch-file-missing-version). What should I do? Thanks for the help! -- Jacob Adams GPG Key: AF6B 1C26 E2D0 A988 432B 94F4 24C0 2B85 B59F E5A9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jacob Adams wrote: It builds those binary packages: beret - Adventures of a telekinetic scientist beret-data - Data for Beret, the adventures of a telekinetic scientist fonts-averia - Averia TrueType Font The Averia font appears to be a separate project and should be packaged from a separate source package rather than the embedded copy of the font being packaged. http://iotic.com/averia/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#776120: RFS: beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package beret * Package name: beret Version : 1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kilmer * URL : https://gitorious.org/beret/beret/ * License : LGPL-3 Section : games It builds those binary packages: beret - Adventures of a telekinetic scientist beret-data - Data for Beret, the adventures of a telekinetic scientist fonts-averia - Averia TrueType Font To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/beret Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/beret/beret_1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1.dsc More information about beret can be obtained from http://kiwisauce.com/beret/. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #652580) * Package included Averia Font (Closes: #776110) Regards, -- Jacob Adams GPG Key: AF6B 1C26 E2D0 A988 432B 94F4 24C0 2B85 B59F E5A9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
